[Internal-cg] Session at ICANN-51

[Mary Uduma]

I agree with Milton's proposition and I think it is an important outing for the ICG members, all should be on stage from beginning to the end of the session.

In addition, prior  topics/themes/talk areas should be greed on and assigned to speakers  aside the initial summary by the chair.  I am hoping  that each of the work leads would naturally speak on their areas and answer relevant questions on behalf of ICG. Where there are gaps, any other member/chair can intervene.

Much of listening and note taking would certainly help the ICG feel the pulse of the Communities and their expectations of the Group.
Based on these, I'll  suggest that the Istanbul agenda  should include a prep to ICANN 51 public session.

Mary Uduma




Mary Uduma








On Saturday, August 9, 2014 4:56 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
 


I believe that all ICG members present should be on stage for the entire thing. And authorized to speak or answer questions or intervene as required, bearing in mind that we need to trust the chair or someone she designates to do the initial summary. 
I think it’s important both symbolically and substantively to have everyone up there, equal status. 
 
--MM
 
From:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström
Sent: Saturday, August 9, 2014 2:23 AM
To: Joe Alhadeff
Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Session at ICANN-51
 
My thinking:
 
1. Someone from ICG must do the initial summary, and I think that should be Alissa as the chair, or whoever she designates
 
2. ICG members should at least during the last open microphone part of the session be on the stage. Exactly how we have to work out when we know the seating arrangement on the stage (as that can not be changed between sessions, and for example ICANN board sessions do set the constraints)
 
So yes, ICG members should be prepared on being on stage for a portion of the session.
 
   Patrik
 
On 9 aug 2014, at 00:43, Joe Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:


will there be speakers on behalf of ICG as a whole or just their constituencies?
>----- Original Message -----
>From: paf at frobbit.se
>To: internal-cg at icann.org
>Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 10:04:23 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>Subject: [Internal-cg] Session at ICANN-51
>
>I got one comment (thanks Manal) and based on that I have submitted the following. > * Session title; Community Discussion with the ICG > * Brief session overview (extensive session overview and agenda > details can be provided closer to the date) The IANA
 Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) will, at the ICANN51 meeting in Los Angeles, have a discussion with the community on various aspects of the transition. The schedule for the session is as follows: - 15 min update from ICG - 30 min update from
 coordinated proposals, 5 min. each. To plan the session accordingly and accommodate max number of requests, groups are required to make themselves known to the ICG in advance, highlighting their coordination activities and sending in proposals and/or material
 they intend to discuss - 45 minutes open microphone where issues are brought up by individuals from the floor and/or remote participants > * Number of attendees ( e.g. 150, 300, 500+) 500+ > * Date, time and duration (From Alice: "based on our experience,
 I > suggest holding the session on Wednesday as this timeframe will allow > communities to hold discussions in their respective meetings prior to > the session") Wednesday or Thursday Patrik 
>_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
 

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140809/a2f066b3/attachment.html>