[Internal-cg] Centralized information portal
Mohamed El Bashir
mbashir at mbash.net
Fri Aug 22 15:57:04 UTC 2014
As the shared pages has details on community process for stakeholders consultations/engagement, I suggest to name page to be named/labeled "IANA Proposal Development".
The new page can have text describing how interested parties can contribute to proposal development beside the links to different links to communities processes.
This new page link could be added to the RFP for reference.
> On 22 Aug 2014, at 08:09, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:
> Here are the RIR links:
> AFRINIC http://afrinic.net/en/community/iana-oversight-transition
> APNIC http://www.apnic.net/ianaxfer
> ARIN http://teamarin.net/education/internet-governance/iana-globalization/
> LACNIC http://www.lacnic.net/pt/web/lacnic/iana-transicion
> RIPE-NCC http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/internet-governance/internet-technical-community/iana/iana-oversight-transition
> Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC <dg at apnic.net>
> http://www.apnic.net +61 7 3858 3100
> See you at APNIC 38! http://conference.apnic.net/38
>> On 22 Aug 2014, at 10:58 am, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>> We have talked now and again about providing a centralized web site where anyone could go to find information about all of the community processes where transition work is taking place. I’m wondering if we could start standing this up before the IGF so that we have a place to point people to when we’re there.
>> From the protocol parameters side, the IETF already has a dedicated page with most of the relevant links: <http://www.ietf.org/iana-transition.html>. Perhaps the one missing link is the draft charter of the IETF working group that is forming to work on the transition proposal: <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-ianaplan/>. We could copy those two links over to the centralized portal or take some selection of the ones on the dedicated page and post them on the portal page.
>> I know there are similar pages some of the RIRs are using (e.g., <
>>> ). Do the RIR folks think we could gather up the right links and information within a week or so? Could the folks participating in the CCWG on the names side do the same? And any others who are participating in other processes that have been started?
>> Do the secretariat folks think we could get a simple page stood up with separate sections for these links and information next week?
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg