[Internal-cg] Centralized information portal

Sat Aug 23 15:28:20 UTC 2014

Kavouss
I think the latest draft of the RFP addresses this. A whole new section was added on “Comment” that allows anyone with specific ideas or dissatisfied with the workings of the operational communities to send in comments to the ICG.

From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 10:38 AM
To: Mohamed El Bashir
Cc: ICG
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Centralized information portal

Dear All,
There are so many exchange of e-mails that ,sometimes, it is difficult to trace the issue raised.
I think Milton raise an important points about some sort os inconsistencies between paragraphs 1 and 2 and suggested a reconcilement between the two.
I agree with him that if we recognized that the process should be inclusive, open ,transparent and democratic, it is not appropriate that we limit the actions and comments to only three operational communities, if there is not consensus with other communities and/or sub-communities and the three operational communities.
I therefore agree ,to a great extent to Milton, that ,if there is no consensus between the views of either of three communities, on the one hand, and the views of other communities or sub-communities, on an issue, then the minority views should be forwarded to and considered by the ICG with a view to find, in an appropriate manner, to reflect the matter.
To this effect the language used in paragraphs 1 and 2 should be reconciled
Kavouss

2014-08-22 17:57 GMT+02:00 Mohamed El Bashir <mbashir at mbash.net<mailto:mbashir at mbash.net>>:
As the shared pages has details on community process for stakeholders consultations/engagement, I suggest to name page to be named/labeled "IANA Proposal Development".

The new page can have text describing how interested parties can contribute to proposal development beside the links to different links to communities processes.

This new page link could be added to the RFP for reference.

Kind Regards,
Mohamed

On 22 Aug 2014, at 08:09, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net<mailto:pwilson at apnic.net>> wrote:
Alissa,

Here are the RIR links:

AFRINIC   http://afrinic.net/en/community/iana-oversight-transition
APNIC     http://www.apnic.net/ianaxfer
ARIN      http://teamarin.net/education/internet-governance/iana-globalization/
LACNIC    http://www.lacnic.net/pt/web/lacnic/iana-transicion
RIPE-NCC  http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/internet-governance/internet-technical-community/iana/iana-oversight-transition

________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                      <dg at apnic.net<mailto:dg at apnic.net>>
http://www.apnic.net                                     +61 7 3858 3100

See you at APNIC 38!                      http://conference.apnic.net/38

On 22 Aug 2014, at 10:58 am, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in<mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>> wrote:

We have talked now and again about providing a centralized web site where anyone could go to find information about all of the community processes where transition work is taking place. I’m wondering if we could start standing this up before the IGF so that we have a place to point people to when we’re there.

From the protocol parameters side, the IETF already has a dedicated page with most of the relevant links: <http://www.ietf.org/iana-transition.html>. Perhaps the one missing link is the draft charter of the IETF working group that is forming to work on the transition proposal: <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-ianaplan/>. We could copy those two links over to the centralized portal or take some selection of the ones on the dedicated page and post them on the portal page.

I know there are similar pages some of the RIRs are using (e.g., <
http://www.lacnic.net/pt/web/lacnic/iana-transicion
). Do the RIR folks think we could gather up the right links and information within a week or so? Could the folks participating in the CCWG on the names side do the same? And any others who are participating in other processes that have been started?

Do the secretariat folks think we could get a simple page stood up with separate sections for these links and information next week?

Thanks,
Alissa
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org<mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org<mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org<mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140823/f039034e/attachment.html>