[Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings

Mary Uduma mnuduma at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 14 20:03:33 UTC 2014

Hello All,

The word  Multi Stakeholder sounds great to me as it is a characterization of the group's composition. Can we consider the following?

Multi-Stakeholder Coordinating  Group on IANA Transition - MSCGIT  or  MCGIT

Multi-Stakeholder Coordinating Group on IANA Stewardship - MSCGIS or MCGIS

Mary Uduma

On Monday, July 14, 2014 7:15 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

I think we're all getting way too cute with this. 
CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself.
Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do.
Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on

> -----Original Message-----
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-
> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM
> To: Narelle Clark
> Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
> > Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
> I agree. That is pretty good.
> I also liked TSIF.
> Jari

Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140714/e3c569ca/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list