[Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings

Paul Wilson pwilson at apnic.net
Wed Jul 16 15:55:06 UTC 2014

Happy to have a new name that makes sense, but if it doesn’t happen very quickly in the next 2 days, I'm with Milton.


On 15 Jul 2014, at 4:14 am, Milton L Mueller <Mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

> I think we're all getting way too cute with this. 
> CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself.
> Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do.
> Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on
> --MM
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-
>> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM
>> To: Narelle Clark
>> Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
>>> Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
>> I agree. That is pretty good.
>> I also liked TSIF.
>> Jari
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list