[Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Wed Jul 16 16:23:35 UTC 2014
To be bluntly explicit: Me too. Either we agree in less than 5 minutes on something new or we remain with coordination group.
Namen sind Schall und Rauch
Sent from a handheld device.
> On 16.07.2014, at 16:55, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:
> Happy to have a new name that makes sense, but if it doesn’t happen very quickly in the next 2 days, I'm with Milton.
>> On 15 Jul 2014, at 4:14 am, Milton L Mueller <Mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>> I think we're all getting way too cute with this.
>> CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself.
>> Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do.
>> Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-
>>> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
>>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM
>>> To: Narelle Clark
>>> Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
>>>> Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
>>> I agree. That is pretty good.
>>> I also liked TSIF.
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
More information about the Internal-cg