[Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
adiel at afrinic.net
Wed Jul 16 16:57:54 UTC 2014
+1. We need not to spend too much time on the name. Im fine with whichever name we use as much as it allows us to do the job. I will go with CG if there is no consensus on any of the other proposals. 5 mins of this at the beginning the 17?
Sent from an iPad
> On Jul 16, 2014, at 20:23, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
> To be bluntly explicit: Me too. Either we agree in less than 5 minutes on something new or we remain with coordination group.
> Namen sind Schall und Rauch
> Sent from a handheld device.
>> On 16.07.2014, at 16:55, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:
>> Happy to have a new name that makes sense, but if it doesn’t happen very quickly in the next 2 days, I'm with Milton.
>>> On 15 Jul 2014, at 4:14 am, Milton L Mueller <Mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>>> I think we're all getting way too cute with this.
>>> CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself.
>>> Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do.
>>> Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-
>>>> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM
>>>> To: Narelle Clark
>>>> Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
>>>>> Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
>>>> I agree. That is pretty good.
>>>> I also liked TSIF.
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
More information about the Internal-cg