[Internal-cg] Timeline

[Paul Wilson]

Thanks Russ.

As the comments show, we’re in a hard place with the schedule, and I think the only solution is a lot flexibility, and parallelising work as much as possible.

Clearly all participants will have a hard time with the schedules, but all need to make a very best effort to move the work along, and I would prefer to challenge everyone at this early stage, while being flexible about target deadlines as they come up (and, about late submissions).  We need to express clearly that we are coordinating not policing, and we will join the community in taking account of the reality of the situation.

Let’s talk of targets rather than deadlines, and best-efforts to meet them.

The more I think about it, I think document management like what was used in NetMundial would be very very useful to the process, so I wonder if Hartmut can help to get access to that system?  

Here is a suggested revision of the timeline document.

Also attached is an Excel view of the timeline, which may be useful to develop further.

Paul.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TimelineDiscussion-v1-pw.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 114532 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140721/2fe8f74c/TimelineDiscussion-v1-pw.docx>
-------------- next part --------------




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Timeline.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 37172 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140721/2fe8f74c/Timeline.xlsx>
-------------- next part --------------


________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                      <dg at apnic.net>
http://www.apnic.net                                     +61 7 3858 3100

See you at APNIC 38!                      http://conference.apnic.net/38





On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:36 am, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:

> Joe:
> 
>> In the meeting some one had said That they has spoken to NTIA which said they didn't have a specific timeline in mind.  
> 
> Since I was presenting the timeline in London, I took it upon myself to ask Larry Strickling.  I thought the information would help the group make a plan.  Larry said that he did not know, and he pointed out that some of the events are outside the control of NTIA.  As I said at the meeting, it was pointed out that Congressional hearings are possible, even likely.  The timeline first discussed on this mail list provided 8 weeks for NTIA evaluation and approval.  Based on the the discussion in London, we decided that a draft should be delivered to NTIA as early as possible, and we should give NTIA more than 8 weeks.
> 
> Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg