[Internal-cg] Redraft of RFP

Narelle Clark narelle.clark at accan.org.au
Fri Jul 25 06:38:23 UTC 2014

My usual practice (in the day job) is to provide a solid web form that as best as possible meets WCAG guidelines, as well as publishing a pdf and MS-word (and by extension easily an odt) in accessible form.

People who collaborate often find passing a file around to each other more effective in collating the content, but then I push for them to agree on the final by a deadline, then designate one party with the login to submit the form.

Of course, I am assuming someone amongst us, or ICANN itself, has the capacity to throw together such a form and database... the one I use is tuned to requesting grant funding...
I ask as this affects how pedantic I get with the review I am currently doing on layout etc - yes I can leave that final form creation to last.

Btw I am really liking it so far.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Wilson [mailto:pwilson at apnic.net] 
Sent: Friday, 25 July 2014 4:32 PM
To: Narelle Clark
Cc: ICG Internal
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Redraft of RFP

I don't have a fixed view or preference on that Narelle. 

Webforms can be a bit unfriendly, but we could make one available for those who want it, while also allowing text/document responses.

For now I think the important thing is to confirm whether this is the approach we want to take, and to complete the document.


Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                      <dg at apnic.net>
http://www.apnic.net                                     +61 7 3858 3100

See you at APNIC 38!                      http://conference.apnic.net/38

On 25 Jul 2014, at 4:25 pm, Narelle Clark <narelle.clark at accan.org.au> wrote:

> This RFP is going to be distributed online via a web based form, yes?
> N
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul Wilson
> Sent: Friday, 25 July 2014 2:04 PM
> To: ICG Internal
> Subject: [Internal-cg] Redraft of RFP
> Thanks to comments from a few of you, here's a further draft of the RFP.
> My feeling is that a very structured approach is needed, and I hope that we can gather all the needed information in this way.  From the IP addressing community, I think we could provide a detailed and complete response in this format, but other will need to be able to do so too.  
> I hope this is useful.
> Paul.

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list