[Internal-cg] Thursday session on accountability

[joseph alhadeff]

Ok for me too.

Joe
On 10/14/2014 11:15 AM, Jon Nevett wrote:
> Me too. Thanks.
>
> Jon
>
> On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com 
> <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Alissa, looks good to me.
>>
>> Keith Drazek
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 14, 2014, at 7:51 AM, "Alissa Cooper" <alissa at cooperw.in 
>> <mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have been invited to participate in the Thursday community session 
>>> about enhancing ICANN accountability 
>>> <http://la51.icann.org/en/schedule/thu-enhancing-accountability>. 
>>> There is a large panel of speakers and I will have a 5-minute slot. 
>>> I have been asked to talk about how the ICG plans to link to the 
>>> parallel accountability process and what discussions have taken 
>>> place about this so far.
>>>
>>> Obviously we have been discussing this a bit amongst ourselves in 
>>> the context of the proposal finalization process and the FAQ, both 
>>> of which are on our agenda for further discussion on Friday. We also 
>>> have a slot on Friday to discuss how we will liaise with the 
>>> accountability CCWG. While the results of these discussions are TBD, 
>>> I think there are a few points I can make, slightly expanding on 
>>> what is in the FAQ:
>>>
>>> 1. Our charter recognizes that maintaining the accountability of 
>>> Internet identifier governance is central to the transition process.
>>>
>>> 2. The ICG has asked the operational communities to consider 
>>> oversight and accountability --- writ large, i.e., "all the ways in 
>>> which oversight is conducted over the IANA functions operator's 
>>> provision of the services and activities" --- in their proposals.
>>>
>>> 3. After receiving consensus proposals from the operational 
>>> communities regarding IANA, the ICG will conduct an analysis and 
>>> assessment of their implications for ICANN accountability. We are 
>>> still discussing what this analysis and assessment will entail, and 
>>> this will depend somewhat on the extent to which ICANN 
>>> accountability is the focus of one or more community proposals.
>>>
>>> 4. We will be having further discussion on Friday to determine how 
>>> we will procedurally liaise with the accountability CCWG, including 
>>> how and when we might communicate the analysis/assessment described 
>>> in (3).
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Alissa
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at icann.org <mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org <mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20141014/daf515a0/attachment-0001.html>