[Internal-cg] Thursday session on accountability

Lynn St.Amour Lynn at lstamour.org
Tue Oct 14 16:57:12 UTC 2014

Hi Alissa,

also think it is important you are there, and agree with the points below.   You could also reiterate some of the points that have been made re the importance of keeping focus on the accountability items that directly affect the transition and no more.   

I would also like us to think about reiterating that while Sept. is an aggressive goal it IS within our collective reach.   Yesterday there were some remarks which might be interpreted as September is a nice goal, but taking more time is quite ok.  IMHO, it is too early to concede that and too early to take pressure off.


On Oct 14, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:

> I have been invited to participate in the Thursday community session about enhancing ICANN accountability <http://la51.icann.org/en/schedule/thu-enhancing-accountability>. There is a large panel of speakers and I will have a 5-minute slot. I have been asked to talk about how the ICG plans to link to the parallel accountability process and what discussions have taken place about this so far.
> Obviously we have been discussing this a bit amongst ourselves in the context of the proposal finalization process and the FAQ, both of which are on our agenda for further discussion on Friday. We also have a slot on Friday to discuss how we will liaise with the accountability CCWG. While the results of these discussions are TBD, I think there are a few points I can make, slightly expanding on what is in the FAQ:
> 1. Our charter recognizes that maintaining the accountability of Internet identifier governance is central to the transition process.
> 2. The ICG has asked the operational communities to consider oversight and accountability — writ large, i.e., "all the ways in which oversight is conducted over the IANA functions operator’s provision of the services and activities” — in their proposals.
> 3. After receiving consensus proposals from the operational communities regarding IANA, the ICG will conduct an analysis and assessment of their implications for ICANN accountability. We are still discussing what this analysis and assessment will entail, and this will depend somewhat on the extent to which ICANN accountability is the focus of one or more community proposals. 
> 4. We will be having further discussion on Friday to determine how we will procedurally liaise with the accountability CCWG, including how and when we might communicate the analysis/assessment described in (3).
> Thoughts?
> Alissa
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list