[Internal-cg] Posting of draft RFP

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear All,
I opened the URL and I read
Quote
'"
(i.e. those with direct operational or service relationships with the IANA
functions operator, in connection with names, numbers, or protocol
parameters). "
Unquote
This is not correct as the beginning should be : including BUT NOT i.e.
Such language restrict the proposals other than those three  operational
communities involved in the process
Pls check the language that we have included in the DRAFT RFP
Regards
Kavouss


2014-09-05 9:54 GMT+02:00 Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>:

> These corrections are good, but confusion about the RFP and its status is
> a Bad Thing.
> I would suggest that the same ICANN staff who sent the announcement should
> send a retraction to the same lists to which it was sent, saying very
> simply and clearly that the transmission was premature, the RFP is still a
> draft, and the ICG will formally issue the final RFP on September 8
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> internal-cg-bounces at icann.org]
> > On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff
> > Sent: Friday, September 5, 2014 3:34 AM
> > To: internal-cg at icann.org
> > Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Posting of draft RFP
> >
> > I have made a similar statement on the IANA transition panel at IGF, in
> my own
> > capacity, as my understanding of the draft with the intention of
> providing
> > communities working on proposals the substantive elements of the RFP as
> soon
> > as possible.
> > On 9/5/2014 3:21 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> > > On 5.09.14 9:01 , Patrik Fältström wrote:
> > >> All,
> > >>
> > >> As you have noticed ICANN posted an announcement as a result of a
> request
> > to have the draft RFP posted, for transparency reasons. I am working with
> > ICANN on coming up with issues that makes this clear.
> > >
> > >
> > > On my own initiative I have just sent the following to
> > > ianatransition at icann.org where I saw the announcement:
> > >
> > > "Be aware that this text has not been formally agreed by the ICG yet.
> > > It is a very very stable draft, but changes may still occur before it
> > > is agreed.
> > >
> > > Daniel"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Internal-cg mailing list
> > > Internal-cg at icann.org
> > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Internal-cg mailing list
> > Internal-cg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140905/f4b667f8/attachment.html>