[Internal-cg] Review of Protocol Parameters and Numbers Proposals for completeness

Patrik Fältström paf at frobbit.se
Fri Feb 6 00:24:38 UTC 2015

I have updated my assessment, and produced both a new clean version and a redline from my original submission.


> On 6 feb 2015, at 07:13, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
> Thanks for sharing this, Patrik.
> Under B.1, on page 6, you say "The Protocol Parameters proposal suggest transfer of the domain name to the IETF Trust.” This is not correct. The numbers proposal is the one that suggests this.
> Alissa
> On Feb 5, 2015, at 1:32 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have spent some time looking at the Numbers and Protocol Parameters proposals in parallel with the IANA Contract and specifically the ICANN Response to the RFP. The goal was to try to identify gaps or overlaps that the proposals did not take into account.
>> Specifically, I looked at two areas:
>> - The registries related to IP addresses and AS numbers
>> - The IANA.ORG domain name
>> I did add the summary of my review in my assessment of the Numbers Proposal where I did start with Wulf Ulrich excellent work (and that is why you see much text in my assessment that is exactly the same words as in his assessment).
>> My assessment is in the dropbox and also attached to this email.
>>   Patrik
>> <numbers-proposal-assessment-paf.doc>_______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150206/ee6c622b/signature.asc>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list