[Internal-cg] Review of Protocol Parameters and Numbers Proposals for completeness

Patrik Fältström paf at frobbit.se
Thu Feb 5 23:20:57 UTC 2015

Oh, yes, you are correct.

I will update my review accordingly.

IETF introduce the text about IANA.ORG with the following wording:

>    Over the course of the development of the document, several
>    suggestions were raised that did not enjoy sufficient support to be
>    included.  Two general areas of suggestion that generated much
>    discussion were

While the Numbers proposal say:

> From the Internet Number Community’s perspective, the IETF Trust would be an acceptable candidate for this role.

And continues:

> The transfer of the IANA trademark and IANA.ORG domain to the IETF Trust will require additional coordination with the other affected communities of the IANA Services, namely, protocol parameters and names.

And then concludes:

> It is the preference of the Internet Number Community that all relevant parties agree to these expectations as part of the transition.

Let me go back and update things.

This do not change by any means my conclusion.


> On 6 feb 2015, at 07:13, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
> Thanks for sharing this, Patrik.
> Under B.1, on page 6, you say "The Protocol Parameters proposal suggest transfer of the domain name to the IETF Trust.” This is not correct. The numbers proposal is the one that suggests this.
> Alissa
> On Feb 5, 2015, at 1:32 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have spent some time looking at the Numbers and Protocol Parameters proposals in parallel with the IANA Contract and specifically the ICANN Response to the RFP. The goal was to try to identify gaps or overlaps that the proposals did not take into account.
>> Specifically, I looked at two areas:
>> - The registries related to IP addresses and AS numbers
>> - The IANA.ORG domain name
>> I did add the summary of my review in my assessment of the Numbers Proposal where I did start with Wulf Ulrich excellent work (and that is why you see much text in my assessment that is exactly the same words as in his assessment).
>> My assessment is in the dropbox and also attached to this email.
>>   Patrik
>> <numbers-proposal-assessment-paf.doc>_______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150206/a8ba6f32/signature.asc>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list