[Internal-cg] Action items from ICG Face-to-Face Meeting #4, 6-7 February 2015
joseph alhadeff
joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Sun Feb 8 02:07:33 UTC 2015
Does waiting for the reply, impact the timing of any of the further
review obligations we have?
On 2/7/2015 8:58 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
> Alissa is awaiting suggestions for a date for a response to this question.
>
> My suggestion is that we request that they tell us within 30 days
> _/how/_ they plan to go about resolving this issue (e.g., meetings,
> etc.) and once they respond in that way we ask them to suggest a
> timeline for how quickly they think they can resolve it.
>
> *From:* internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Milton L Mueller
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 7, 2015 8:50 PM
> *To:* Jennifer Chung; 'ICG'
> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] Action items from ICG Face-to-Face
> Meeting #4, 6-7 February 2015
>
> Jennifer,
>
> You forgot the question we agreed to send jointly to the numbers and
> protocol parameters group.
>
> I was responsible for this, but yesterday when I said it was “done” I
> meant that the question had been approved by the group. I do not think
> it was “finished” in the sense that we have formally transmitted it to
> the two OCs. I would like to know how that will be done, and when.
>
> For everyone’s reference, here is the agreed question:
>
> The IETF consensus as reflected in draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
> did not include a formal request to change the arrangements regarding
> the IANA trademark and the iana.org <http://iana.org> domain as a
> requirement of its transition proposal. But Section III.A.2 of the RIR
> proposal says:
>
> "With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG <http://IANA.ORG>
> domain, it is the expectation of the Internet Number Community that
> both are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a
> particular IANA Numbering Services Operator. Identifying an
> organization that is not the IANA Numbering Services Operator and
> which will permanently hold these assets will facilitate a smooth
> transition should another operator (or operators) be selected in the
> future. It is the preference of the Internet Number Community that the
> IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG <http://IANA.ORG> domain name be
> transferred to an entity independent of the IANA Numbering Services
> Operator, in order to ensure that these assets are used in a
> non-discriminatory manner for the benefit of the entire community.
> From the Internet Number Community’s perspective, the IETF Trust would
> be an acceptable candidate for this role.”
>
> The numbers proposal sees these changes as a requirement of the
> transition and the protocols parameters proposal does not. If these
> aspects of the proposals are perceived as incompatible would the
> numbers and protocol parameters communities be willing to modify their
> proposals to reconcile them?
>
> *From:* internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jennifer Chung
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 7, 2015 6:40 PM
> *To:* 'ICG'
> *Subject:* [Internal-cg] Action items from ICG Face-to-Face Meeting
> #4, 6-7 February 2015
>
> Hello All,
>
> As reviewed by the ICG chairs, please find the list of action items
> from the ICG Face-to-Face Meeting #4 below:
>
> 1. Secretariat to summarize questions/answers resolved internally
> about the protocol parameters proposal and numbers proposal discussed.
>
> 2. Arkko to compile a list of for a request for information from the
> protocol parameters community re jurisdiction, NTIA oversight and send
> it to internal-cg list.
>
> 3. Wilson to request clarification from CRISP team, questions put
> forth by Arasteh (regarding Section II.B.2 and III.A of the numbers
> proposal).
>
> 4. ICG chairs to review details of the proposal finalization process
> and refine ICG timeline with assistance from Secretariat.
>
> 5. Ismail, Arasteh, St. Amour, Alhadeff, Subrenat to continue working
> on community comments handling document with suggestions put forward
> by other ICG members.
>
> 6. ICG to continue to discuss and agree on talking points and ICG
> chairs to send bullet points for Monday session on the internal-cg list.
>
> 7. Fältström to communicate with CWG-IANA and CCWG-Accountability
> before coordinating ICG teleconference schedule.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Jennifer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150207/d0579aea/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list