[Internal-cg] Timeline and proposal finalization process updates

michael niebel fmniebel at gmail.com
Tue Feb 24 17:15:04 UTC 2015


I am not sure whether the addition that you propose - although factually
correct - could not be interpreted as inappropriately prescriptive through
the backdoor.


On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Daniel Karrenberg <
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:

> The actions before we receive the CWG response are very reasonable and I
> support them. I am ambivalent as far as a public comment period is
> concerned.
> I still believe we should tell the CWG that we are prepared to work as
> expeditiously as possible once we receive their proposal and ask them to
> let us know if there are any changes in their delivery date.
> I also propose to add this to what we say: "The time that the ICG will
> need to produce its output will be shortest if the CWG response is simple,
> has little or no dependencies on other work and is compatible with the
> responses already received from the protocol parameters and numbers
> communities."
> Daniel
> On 23.02.15 18:22 , Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> ...
>> (1) What does the ICG plan to do before receiving the CWG proposal?
>> (2) What does the ICG plan to do after receiving the CWG proposal?
>> ...
>>  _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150224/907378fb/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list