[Internal-cg] Dates for meeting in Buenos Aires

Mon Mar 2 17:21:18 UTC 2015

Thanks Patrik for nailing down 18 and 19 June.
I agree with those who consider it useful to have sufficient time to make the most of Buenos Aires to get our proposal under way.
Best regards,
Jean-Jacques.

----- Mail original -----
De: mnuduma at yahoo.com
À: "Martin Boyle" <Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk>, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>, "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu>
Cc: "ICG" <internal-cg at icann.org>
Envoyé: Lundi 2 Mars 2015 11:20:21
Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Dates for meeting in Buenos Aires

I also agree with Martin and Kavouss on the value and the impact the meeting will have on work of the ICG‎. Good to hold it. 
Mary Uduma 

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. 

From: Martin Boyle 
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015 10:18 
To: Kavouss Arasteh; Milton L Mueller 
Cc: ICG 
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Dates for meeting in Buenos Aires 

I strongly agree with Kavouss on this. We will obviously have some questions of our own on the detail of the names proposal (although the outcome of that process is likely to be a finely balanced compromise with little room for manoeuvre), but the key part will be to ensure discussion between the groups to find how the different proposals can work together. 

Martin 

From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh 
Sent: 28 February 2015 14:08 
To: Milton L Mueller 
Cc: ICG 
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Dates for meeting in Buenos Aires 

Dear All, 

I am of the view that such a meeting would be useful since till now Protocol parameter and Numbers have just talked to each other and with ICG. It is important the Names commujnity also attend similar meeting that we had before and be aware of the progress made by two other comminity and actions being taken by ICG and so on 

Regards 

Kavouss 

2015-02-27 23:30 GMT+01:00 Milton L Mueller < mueller at syr.edu >: 

> -----Original Message----- 
> 2. Do you think a session very similar to the last one we had (with the 
> three OC) would be interesting? 

I don't think all three OCs would be needed by that point, it would be all about names, wouldn't it? 
If we do have numbers and protocols present for the session, they should prepare very abbreviated presentations, not like the ones they did last time. 

_______________________________________________ 
Internal-cg mailing list 
Internal-cg at icann.org 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg 

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg