[IOT] Some IRP comments treatment for Frist Reading

[Malcolm Hutty]

That the lack of hope of a second term is the best guarantee of independence. 

(An argument that has a certain pedigree, for fans of the Federalist Papers). 

Sent from my iDevice; please excuse terseness and typos.

> On 17 May 2017, at 21:54, Mike Rodenbaugh <mike at rodenbaugh.com> wrote:
> 
> Sorry to miss calls and not have reviewed transcripts... But, briefly, what is argument to limit to one term?
> 
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> RODENBAUGH LAW
> tel/fax: +1.415.738.8087
> http://rodenbaugh.com
> 
>> On May 17, 2017 8:03 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Malcolm, thanks for reviving the undecided point.  Let's make sure that (in addition to Mike) we get the views of those who have not yet weighed in.  If "one and done" is the active consensus of the group that's fine.  But let's make sure we have achieved consensus by viewpoint and not by exhaustion.
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>> Greg Shatan
>> C: 917-816-6428
>> S: gsshatan
>> gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Mike Rodenbaugh <mike at rodenbaugh.com> wrote:
>>> I would support renewal.  It is important for panelists to have experience in these matters, so to me that justifies at least one renewal term.
>>> 
>>> Mike Rodenbaugh
>>> RODENBAUGH LAW
>>> tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
>>> http://rodenbaugh.com 
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-05-12 16:46, McAuley, David via IOT wrote:
>>>>> Even though we appeared to agree on the call May 3rd that panelists
>>>>> would have one five-year term with no opportunity for renewal, we
>>>>> discussed that notion further yesterday and the balance tilted toward
>>>>> allowing for a one-time renewal of an additional five-year term (total
>>>>> cap on service as panelist at ten years). The discussion yesterday on
>>>>> this issue is largely captured on pages 18 - 22 of the "Raw Caption
>>>>> Notes" of the call accessible here by scrolling down:
>>>>> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=64084338
>>>> 
>>>> I have now read the "Raw caption notes" (transcript), and I see that
>>>> Greg was the only person speaking in favour of a change of position.
>>>> Avri noted that Greg's points "had made her less certain of her position"
>>>> but that "I haven't completely switched over."
>>>> 
>>>> Nobody else expressed a view.
>>>> 
>>>> As a matter of process, I therefore assume that the position agreed
>>>> on the previous call remains intact. i.e. no renewal.
>>>> 
>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Malcolm
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>>             Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
>>>>    Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
>>>>  London Internet Exchange | http://www.linx.net/publicaffairs
>>>> 
>>>>                  London Internet Exchange Ltd
>>>>              24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ
>>>> 
>>>>          Company Registered in England No. 3137929
>>>>        Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> IOT mailing list
>>>> IOT at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IOT mailing list
>>> IOT at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot
>>> 
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/attachments/20170518/b1f1d4ca/attachment.html>