[IOT] Some IRP comments treatment for Frist Reading
Arasteh
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Thu May 18 11:10:01 UTC 2017
Dear All
In my view we hold 120 days as agreed . As for the second deadline our previous conclusion should also be maintained
Regards
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
> On 17 May 2017, at 18:28, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-05-12 16:46, McAuley, David via IOT wrote:
>> Even though we appeared to agree on the call May 3rd that panelists
>> would have one five-year term with no opportunity for renewal, we
>> discussed that notion further yesterday and the balance tilted toward
>> allowing for a one-time renewal of an additional five-year term (total
>> cap on service as panelist at ten years). The discussion yesterday on
>> this issue is largely captured on pages 18 - 22 of the "Raw Caption
>> Notes" of the call accessible here by scrolling down:
>> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=64084338
>
> I have now read the "Raw caption notes" (transcript), and I see that
> Greg was the only person speaking in favour of a change of position.
> Avri noted that Greg's points "had made her less certain of her position"
> but that "I haven't completely switched over."
>
> Nobody else expressed a view.
>
> As a matter of process, I therefore assume that the position agreed
> on the previous call remains intact. i.e. no renewal.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Malcolm
>
>
> --
> Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
> Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
> London Internet Exchange | http://www.linx.net/publicaffairs
>
> London Internet Exchange Ltd
> 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ
>
> Company Registered in England No. 3137929
> Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IOT mailing list
> IOT at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot
More information about the IOT
mailing list