[IOT] Next IOT meeting [changed subject line]

Wed Apr 24 15:20:16 UTC 2019

Thanks Chris – sorry about that –

Bernie, I am swamped today,let’s discuss tomorrow if you can

David McAuley

Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager

Verisign Inc.

703-948-4154

From: Chris Disspain <chris at disspain.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 11:12 AM
To: Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>; McAuley, David <dmcauley at Verisign.com>
Cc: iot at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IOT] Next IOT meeting [changed subject line]

Gentlemen,

That is the last day of the GDD summit in Bangkok which may make it challenging for some especially as 1900 UTC is 0100 in Bangkok.

Cheers,

CD

   On 24 Apr 2019, at 15:24, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com<mailto:turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>> wrote:

   All,

   To avoid wasting time and resources could you please confirm via email at least 48 hours prior to the proposed meeting if you are planning on attending.

   Thank You

   Bernard Turcotte

   ICANN Staff Support to the IOT

   On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:44 AM McAuley, David via IOT <iot at icann.org<mailto:iot at icann.org>> wrote:

      Dear members of the IOT:

      Some weeks have passed since my email (forwarded below) asking for any further thoughts regarding the challenge to ICANN Org’s continued participation in the IOT as a full member rather than on a staff-support-only basis.

      Thank you for weighing in<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/2019-March/000499.html>, Robin.

      And so on this issue and on finishing the supplementary rules we have work to do and thus I propose that we meet on Thursday, May 9th, at our usual 19:00 UTC time to pick up following this hiatus for further opinions on the challenge issue.

      I see the next meeting as re-organizational in a manner – to come together to decide how best to forward the challenge to decision-makers (the emails cited below and Robin’s email pertain) and to approach/organize for further work, most importantly to finish the supplementary rules.

      It would be nice, Sam, to get an update/insight from ICANN Org on these matters and especially, if possible, to get an update on how and when efforts will be undertaken to add additional members to the IOT.

      Many thanks all – and best wishes

      David

      David McAuley

      Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager

      Verisign Inc.

      703-948-4154

      From: IOT <iot-bounces at icann.org<mailto:iot-bounces at icann.org>> On Behalf Of McAuley, David via IOT
      Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 5:32 PM
      To: iot at icann.org<mailto:iot at icann.org>; aloup at usc.edu<mailto:aloup at usc.edu>
      Subject: [EXTERNAL] [IOT] Any further thoughts?

      Dear members of the IRP IOT:

      Several weeks ago I posted a suggested approach<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/2019-March/000489.html> to Malcolm’s challenge and in turn Malcolm posted a separate approach in two emails, here<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/2019-March/000490.html>, and here<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/2019-March/000492.html>.

      Are there any other thoughts on this?, if so please post on list.

      Both Bernie and I will be away – I am out until April 5th and Bernie will likely be away for several days. Can anyone wanting to weigh in on the challenge issue specifically please do so by Monday, April 8.

      Thank you,

      David

      David McAuley

      Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager

      Verisign Inc.

      703-948-4154

      _______________________________________________
      IOT mailing list
      IOT at icann.org<mailto:IOT at icann.org>
      https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot

   _______________________________________________
   IOT mailing list
   IOT at icann.org<mailto:IOT at icann.org>
   https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/attachments/20190424/8f85fb23/attachment-0001.html>