AW: [ispcp] RE: IRT statement

KnobenW at telekom.de KnobenW at telekom.de
Thu Oct 29 02:13:19 UTC 2009


 
 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen 
Best regards 
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben 


Deutsche Telekom AG  
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben 
Heinrich-Hertz-Str. 3-7 
D - 64295 Darmstadt 
+49 2244 873999 (Tel.) 
+49 2151 5300 5206 (PC-Fax) 
+49 151 1452 5867 (Mobil) 
http://www.telekom.com <http://www.telekom.com/>  

Deutsche Telekom AG 
Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Lehner (Vorsitzender) 
Vorstand: René Obermann (Vorsitzender) 
Timotheus Höttges (stellvertretender Vorsitzender) 
Hamid Akhavan, Manfred Balz, Reinhard Clemens, Niek Jan van Damme, Guido Kerkhoff, Thomas Sattelberger 
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 6794 
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn 
WEEE-Reg.-Nr.: DE50478376 

Maggie,
 
I didn't receive the draft. Could you please forward it to this E-Mail address?
 
Thanks

  _____  

Von: owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Tony Holmes
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2009 01:59
An: 'Mansourkia, Magnolia'; ispcp at icann.org
Betreff: [ispcp] RE: IRT statement



Maggie (and drafting team)

 

Many thanks for producing this and meeting the time constraints. 

 

I'm fine with the content, its brief and covers what's required as the initial ISPCP input.

 

Tony

 

From: Mansourkia, Magnolia [mailto:maggie.mansourkia at verizon.com] 
Sent: 28 October 2009 07:27
To: ispcp at icann.org; Tony Holmes
Subject: IRT statement
Importance: High

 

Hi all. These are the proposed bullet points that Tony will use as the basis of our constituency statement for the IRT working group.  Please review and provide your comments to the list.  Obviously, we did not address every question in the letter, only those that we had a vested interest in.  

 

*	There is no need for the clearinghouse to be separate and independent from ICANN.  ICANN should oversee and have complete responsibility for the clearinghouse. 

*	URS must be mandatory.  Staff's belief that there is a strong incentive to do this anyway does not address the impact of a business model formed as a haven for bad actors.   

*	The clearinghouse is an existing and proven model that preserves rights while expediting the registrants ability to register domains that do not infringe on the rights of others.  It is a model that should extend to existing registries, but consideration should be given to the timing.  

Please copy the list on your response, if any.  Tony will need our responses by end of day, Thursday, October 29th.

Thanks, 

M.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20091029/7c74bcd0/attachment.html>


More information about the ispcp mailing list