AW: [ispcp] RE: IRT statement

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

Maggie,
 
I've just seen your text attached. I'm fully fine with this.
 
Thank you 
 
Wolf-Ulrich
 

  _____  

Von: owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org] Im
Auftrag von Tony Holmes
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2009 01:59
An: 'Mansourkia, Magnolia'; ispcp at icann.org
Betreff: [ispcp] RE: IRT statement



Maggie (and drafting team)

 

Many thanks for producing this and meeting the time constraints. 

 

I'm fine with the content, its brief and covers what's required as the
initial ISPCP input.

 

Tony

 

From: Mansourkia, Magnolia [mailto:maggie.mansourkia at verizon.com] 
Sent: 28 October 2009 07:27
To: ispcp at icann.org; Tony Holmes
Subject: IRT statement
Importance: High

 

Hi all. These are the proposed bullet points that Tony will use as the
basis of our constituency statement for the IRT working group.  Please
review and provide your comments to the list.  Obviously, we did not
address every question in the letter, only those that we had a vested
interest in.  

 

*	There is no need for the clearinghouse to be separate and
independent from ICANN.  ICANN should oversee and have complete
responsibility for the clearinghouse. 

*	URS must be mandatory.  Staff's belief that there is a strong
incentive to do this anyway does not address the impact of a business
model formed as a haven for bad actors.   

*	The clearinghouse is an existing and proven model that preserves
rights while expediting the registrants ability to register domains that
do not infringe on the rights of others.  It is a model that should
extend to existing registries, but consideration should be given to the
timing.  

Please copy the list on your response, if any.  Tony will need our
responses by end of day, Thursday, October 29th.

Thanks, 

M.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20091029/70938e3a/attachment.html>