[itipanel] an earlier mention of "DNS V2"

[Paul Vixie]

https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2012-October/009314.html

> less naively, i now know that had we cut deeper, as in use a new port
> number, call it "DNS V2", let initiators treat UDP/53 as a fallback
> path, then sixteen years would have been much too short. many people
> would have come out of the woodwork to help us. we would have unicode
> encoding of all names, XML encoding of all transactions, TLS security
> for all parts of the path, X.509 dependencies, no possibility of DANE,
> and most transactions would now use TCP. the result would never work
> outside anyone's lab, but would have been standardized anyway, several
> times over a twenty year span, by the end of which the world would have
> moved on to less open standards that could deliver usable functionality
> in fractional-year time frames.


-- 
Paul Vixie, CEO
Farsight Security, Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/itipanel/attachments/20140222/172cc493/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vixie.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/itipanel/attachments/20140222/172cc493/vixie.vcf>