[ksk-rollover] (Un)planning future KSK replacements

[Michael StJohns]

On 3/28/2019 5:14 AM, Salz, Rich via ksk-rollover wrote:
>
> At the BoF at IETF 104 I suggested the following.
>
> Make the next KSK rollover scheduled.  After that, do not announce 
> them. It is the only way to train the infrastructure to be ready to 
> handle emergencies.
>
I mostly agree with this, and would totally agree if we were completely 
5011 based, but that's not the case.  I think there needs to be an 
"interested parties" announcement even if this isn't announced widely.  
E.g. ISPs that do manual configuration on roll-their-own DNS resolvers etc.


>
> _______________________________________________
> ksk-rollover mailing list
> ksk-rollover at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ksk-rollover


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ksk-rollover/attachments/20190328/09416765/attachment.html>