[Latingp] For consideration at LGP first meeting (Agenda point 4)
meikal at mumin.de
Thu Sep 17 07:40:49 UTC 2015
I agree with the Paul.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 17.09.2015 um 03:38 schrieb Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at icann.org>:
> This request is fairly confusing, at least to me, on three counts:
> 1) Section B.3.4.2 of the LGR Procedures document says "Finally, in investigating the possible variant relations, Generation Panels should ignore cases where the relation is based exclusively on aspects of visual similarity."
> 2) The Armenian script does not appear to be related to the Latin script in the sense of the LGR rules. The characters that might have similar usage in the scripts mostly look completely different.
> 3) Even ignoring the previous two points, the request seems to be for cross-script variants, such as for an Armenian letter that looks like a Latin letter. The "Guidelines for LGR" document indicates that cross-script variants might be created, but gives no hints about why we should do that given that the root zone will consist of labels of a single script (according to Section A.3.1).
> This feels to me like the Armenian GP's submission is not related to ours, so we should not be commenting on it.
> --Paul Hoffman
> Latingp mailing list
> Latingp at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Latingp