[RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff] [Ext] Re: Request from last plenary call on WHOIS/RDS discussions at Board level

[Jean-Baptiste Deroulez]

Hi Carlton,

Thank you for your quick reply and clarification.

Based on your request, we would recommend you review the Rec 2 briefing<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69279139/WHOIS%20Briefing%20-%2003October2017%20-%20V2.0.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1506780907000&api=v2>, and suggest that your subgroup begins with the information and links provided on the subgroup's wiki page<https://community.icann.org/display/WHO/WHOIS1+Rec+%232%3A+Single+WHOIS+Policy>, and identify any additional resources you may need beyond those.

Kind regards,

Jean-Baptiste

From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
Date: Monday, December 4, 2017 at 7:13 PM
To: Jean-Baptiste Deroulez <jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>
Cc: RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership <rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: Request from last plenary call on WHOIS/RDS discussions at Board level

Hi Jean-Bapiste:
The request goes back to Rec#2 of the 2012 WHOIS Review. As that time, the Review Team reported[icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_final-2Dreport-2D11may12-2Den.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=a5VfrQZP4r0Kte2xBJT17IgRyRBHECC3vHSuFP_QBqD22G4dgkHhRZBEhshbjycD&m=pq8IF4B2kAangx3YQMVTPMTbtOy9Cp71CNk238s7gzg&s=gw0UJ7JyfcTUWzA2pqk5m3VJxJ3bk8gjQAUz49-e5jc&e=> they were challenged " to find a clear, concise, well-communicated WHOIS Policy."

The recommendation began by stating the finding; WHOIS policy is "poorly defined and decentralized". They then stated their remedy; " ICANN Board should oversee the creation of a single WHOIS policy document, and reference it in subsequent versions of agreements with Contracted Parties."

The subgroup would be in search of that policy document and all subsequent contracted parties records.  We would limit the last set to the RA's and RAA's subsequent to 2012 and the Final Report. If the Staff would produce these for us that would be a very good start. Board-level discussions surrounding the implementation of that recommendation would be important input for the second part of our work; map recommendation vs. implementation so that we can authoritatively state success - or not - with its implementation and report any gaps.

Hence the request.

Best,
-Carlton



==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799<tel:(876)%20818-1799>
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez <jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org<mailto:jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>> wrote:
Dear Carlton,

During the last RDS plenary meeting, you had expressed in the Adobe chat[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_download_attachments_74581588_AC-2520Chat-5FRDS-2520Plenary-2520-252312-5F20Nov2017.pdf-3Fversion-3D1-26modificationDate-3D1511196010000-26api-3Dv2&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=a5VfrQZP4r0Kte2xBJT17IgRyRBHECC3vHSuFP_QBqD22G4dgkHhRZBEhshbjycD&m=pq8IF4B2kAangx3YQMVTPMTbtOy9Cp71CNk238s7gzg&s=DLu6H8gfE5ckcxgPkTDAoPMnqRgNmWtx_2RrEATc5KQ&e=> an ask to “see all relevant WHOIS/RDS discussions at Board level be source materials for the Team; especially the sub-groups pertaining Strategy and Policy”, and the review team leadership would like you to provide more details on this request.

Could you please clarify your request at your earliest convenience?

Many thanks in advance,

Kind regards,

Jean-Baptiste


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff/attachments/20171205/dd2a503e/attachment.html>