[RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff] Plenary call #6 Action Items

Fri Sep 1 12:13:44 UTC 2017

Dear Jean-Baptiste,

Many thanks, two quick comments:

On the first bullet: I think for clarity's sake it could be changed to read:

  *   On scope as per the Bylaws section 4.6.e.ii: Review Team agreed to treat separately
     *   the effectiveness of the now current gTLD registry directory service and
     *   whether its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement, promoting consumer trust and safeguarding registrant data.
The team also agreed that it may be useful to draw on the first WHOIS Review Team Scope of Work discussions for guidance on further defining the criterion of effectiveness.

On the "Carlton's issue" bullet: could you make that one a bit clearer? A few days from now everyone will have forgotten what this refers to, and I have to admit I'm already struggling.

Thanks
Cathrin

Cathrin Bauer-Bulst
Deputy Head of Unit
Cybercrime

[cid:image001.png at 01CE198E.B254B7B0]
European Commission
DG Migration and Home Affairs
Unit D4 - Cybercrime

What we do: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/organized-crime-and-human-trafficking/cybercrime/index_en.htm

The views expressed in this e-mail are my own and may not be interpreted
as stating an official position of the European Commission.

From: rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste Deroulez
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 2:03 PM
To: rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff at icann.org
Subject: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff] Plenary call #6 Action Items

Dear Alan, Dear Cathrin,

Can you please confirm the below identified decisions reached and action items can be shared with the review team?

Decisions reached:

·         On scope 4.6.e.ii: Review Team will treat all three separately.
·         On Scope: On OECD, Review Team will conduct: simple review noting that there are issues and pointing at other groups which have more in-depth on the issue, and may consider recommending that it be dropped or replaced for future reviews.
·         On scope - Review Team won't be addressing GNSO suggestion "Assess how RDS current & future recommendations might be improved and better coordinated".
·         On scope - Review will evaluate whether RDAP should be implemented before policy is developed.
·         On scope - Compliance is within scope, and Review Team will take a look at it deeper.
·         On scope: Carlton's issue is suitable, a low effort one and will be included in the review, the wording will be refined slightly.
·         On scope: IDN: Within Scope, with minimal effort on it.
·         On timeline (cf Fact Sheet): agreement to publicize 12-month timeframe.

Action items:

ToR:
·         On removal/replacement of Team Members, include following edits: new member instead of replacement, 70 % for both thresholds, refuses instead of fails.
·         On Dependencies section: - add GDPR, - add text "ICANN org to update list and alert RDS-WHOIS2 of any changes to the list"

·         Scope
·         On Scope: Row 2: Stephanie to provide definition of effectiveness

·         Fact Sheet
·         Address fact sheet question on how sections percentages are defined.

·         Briefings
·         Share schedule of briefings - this will inform decision whether to hold Sept 28th meeting or not.

Many thanks in advance

Kind regards,

Jean-Baptiste
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff/attachments/20170901/8870bbff/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6389 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff/attachments/20170901/8870bbff/image001-0001.png>