[RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff] Interview

[Alan Greenberg]

Susan, are you suggesting adding the new answers 
to the 4th question in addition to the ones I 
listed?  That is likely to go way over 90 seconds.

In any case, I am happy to leave 1 and 4 to you and I will take 2 and 3.

Alan


At 22/10/2018 12:03 PM, Susan Kawaguchi wrote:

>Please see my comments in the thread below.
>
>On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 5:22 PM Alan Greenberg 
><<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>Possible answers.
>
>
>At 21/10/2018 05:40 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>Thanks. See below.
>>
>>At 21/10/2018 03:16 AM, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez wrote:
>>>Hi Alan,
>>>
>>>Thank you for your email. We had included 
>>>suggested questions in the invitation, see below:
>>>
>>>We̢۪re planning on asking the following 
>>>suggested ed questions (below). We̢۪ve also 
>>>included a suggested md max time in which to 
>>>answer each question. These are merely 
>>>suggestions in an effort to keep the video 
>>>under 3 minutes as people tend not to watch 
>>>videos over this length. Having said that, 
>>>ultimately the video will be as long as you 
>>>need to address the following questions:
>>>
>>>·                    What is the overall 
>>>focus of the RDS-WHOIS2 Review? (For those who 
>>>are not intimately familiar with the RDS-WHOIS2 Review)- (10 sec).
>
>Review implementation of first WHOIS-RT 
>Recommendations is the first mandatory 
>requirement. In addition, among the other areas 
>we are looking at are a review of all new 
>policies implemented since the lat review and 
>the relationship between RDS/WHOIS and Law 
>Enforcement activities; and a new review of a 
>number of aspects of Contractual Compliance
>
>>>·                    In which stage/process 
>>>is the review right now? - (10 sec).
>
>We have largely finished our analysis and have 
>drafted our recommendations. We are looking 
>forward to the input we receive to further 
>refine out conclusions and recommendations.
>
>>>·                     What did the review 
>>>focus on, and what are the key findings? - (60 sec).
>                          What are the key Review findings?
>
>
>
>>I would drop the first half. It is redundant 
>>with the 1stt question and will allow more time for the answer to the 2nd part.
>
>During our review of the last RT's 
>recommendations, we have concluded that just 
>half of them have been fully implemented and for 
>the other half, there are significant areas 
>where the implementations were somewhat lacking. 
>Our survey of law enforcement use of RDS/WHOIS 
>has provided information that was to our 
>knowledge previously unexplored. In regard to 
>Compliance, we found that ICANN's Contractual 
>Compliance has very significantly improved over 
>the last years, but we believe that there is 
>still lots of room for improvement.
>
>
>>>·                     What are the key 
>>>draft recommendations that result from the RDS-WHOIS2 Review? – (90 sec).
>>
>>Can you give us some examples of the key draft 
>>recommendations that result from this review. 
>>Or perhaps can you give us a few examples of 
>>the recommendation in your draft review.
>
>            We should reference Recommendation 
> 1.2 - To support this mechanism, the ICANN 
> Board should instruct the ICANN Organization to 
> assign responsibility for monitoring 
> legislative and policy development around the 
> world and to provide regular updates to the Board.
>
>    4.1 The ICANN Board should direct ICANN 
> Contractual Compliance to proactively monitor 
> and enforce RDS (WHOIS) data accuracy 
> requirements to look for and address systemic 
> issues. A risk-based approach should be 
> executed to assess and understand inaccuracy 
> issues and then take the appropriate actions to mitigate them.
>
>
>
>
>Options:
>
>Treat RDS/WHOIS as a strategic priority. REALLY.
>
>Contractual Compliance needs to use more agile 
>techniques to addressing patters of abuse 
>instead of just focusing on specific complaints.
>
>As available RDS/WHOIS data evolves in light of 
>privacy legislatio,n ICANN's WHOIS portal must 
>be kept up to date to ensure the the maximum 
>lawfully available data is available through this portal.
>
>Surveys should be done on a regular basis to 
>understand the relationship between RDS/WHOIS 
>and its uses in law enforcement and cybersecurity.
>
>RDS/WHOIS data accuracy must be a specific 
>focus, particularly in light of the redactions due to privacy legislation.
>
>
>>One of Susan or I can handle 1, the other 2 and 
>>3 and then back to the first person for 4.
>>
>>Cathrin and Susan, comments on the questions 
>>and Susan, comments on speaker order.
>>
>>Alan
>_______________________________________________
>RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff mailing list
><mailto:RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff at icann.org>RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff/attachments/20181022/b10572ab/attachment-0001.html>