[RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Scope discussion

[Dmitry Belyavsky]

Dear Alan,

I agree with the principles you suggest and with most of your position
about particular parts of scope.
But I think we shouldn't exclude RDAP from the scope of the review.

We already have RDAP ICANN gTLD Profile, where RDAP is described as "new
protocol was created as a replacement for the WHOIS protocol".
I think that such description at least allows us to say whether RDAP closes
all or most known problems related to current WHOIS.


On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
wrote:

> In preparation for our discussion on Scope tomorrow, I have tried to
> collect all of the issues raised to date in a simple list. If I have missed
> something, I do apologize, and please raise it tomorrow.
>
> The list includes:
>
> - Origin of issue and reference to where there may be further information.
> The two sources so far are the ICANN Bylaws and the document that Karen
> distributed summarizing earlier e-mails.
>
> - A very brief description.
>
> - My take on whether it is something we could address
>
> - The final decision of the group as to whether to include it or not.
> (currently all blank)
>
> I have also outlined the start of what I think are reasonable principles
> to guide our work.
>
> Alan
> _______________________________________________
> RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
> RDS-WHOIS2-RT at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
>
>


-- 
SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/attachments/20170817/794cbf6b/attachment.html>