[RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Replacement and Removal of Members

[Alan Greenberg]

Hi Erika,

To be clear, are you suggesting that we have a higher threshold (70%) 
to ask an AC/SO to remove their member that we need to do the removal 
ourselves (presuming we keep the latter power)??

No problem with New vs Replacement.

Alan

At 27/08/2017 07:36 AM, Erika Mann wrote:
>Thank you Alan!
>
>Two recommendations (see in yellow below) , but I'm supporting the 
>current text as well if most members are okay with your text.
>
>Kind regards,
>Erika
>
>
>If a Review Team member is no longer able or willing to serve, or if 
>an SO/AC withdraws its endorsement of the member, the SO/AC making 
>the original endorsement will be requested to refill the position 
>with a new (delete = replacement) member. The SO/AC will make the 
>selection according to their own processes and will not be bound to 
>consider only those candidates who originally applied requesting 
>their endorsement.
>
>If a Review Team member is sufficiently inactive or disruptive as to 
>cause (delete = at leas) (50%) 70% of Review Team members (excluding 
>the member in question) to request their removal, the member will be 
>asked to resign. If the member fails to resign, the SO/AC that 
>endorsed the member will be requested to withdraw their endorsement 
>and replace the member. Should the SO/AC not take action, the member 
>can be removed by a 2/3 majority vote of the remaining Review Team 
>members. In all cases, the balloting will be carried out in such a 
>way as to not reveal how individual members voted.
>
>On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Alan Greenberg 
><<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>I was asked to propose wording for the section of the Terms of 
>Reference on Replacement and Removal of Members
>I would like to propose the following wording for the consideration of the RT.
>Alan
>=======
>If a Review Team member is no longer able or willing to serve, or if 
>an SO/AC withdraws its endorsement of the member, the SO/AC making 
>the original endorsement will be requested to refill the position 
>with a replacement member. The SO/AC will make the selection 
>according to their own processes and will not be bound to consider 
>only those candidates who originally applied requesting their endorsement.
>If a Review Team member is sufficiently inactive or disruptive as to 
>cause at least 50% of Review Team members (excluding the member in 
>question) to request their removal, the member will be asked to 
>resign. If the member fails to resign, the SO/AC that endorsed the 
>member will be requested to withdraw their endorsement and replace 
>the member. Should the SO/AC not take action, the member can be 
>removed by a 2/3 majority vote of the remaining Review Team members. 
>In all cases, the balloting will be carried out in such a way as to 
>not reveal how individual members voted.
>_______________________________________________
>RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
><mailto:RDS-WHOIS2-RT at icann.org>RDS-WHOIS2-RT at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/attachments/20170828/61dce382/attachment.html>