[RDS-WHOIS2-RT] GUIDANCE NEEDED - Planning

[Alan Greenberg]

Hi Cathrin,

Without going into the details of the GNSO 
proposal (which I will shortly), by saying the 
GAC does not endorse the last point in the GNSO 
Proposal (ensure no duplication of work between 
the RDS-RT and the GNSO RDS PDP), are you saying 
that the GAC supports us duplicating the RDS PDP work?

Alan

At 22/06/2017 04:32 PM, Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu wrote:
>Hi Alice, hi team,
>
>Sounds like September – perhaps 2nd half? – is a 
>possibility. I would also be available, same 
>goes for the rest of the autumn. Having one 
>meeting before ICANN60 and one at ICANN60 is a 
>good idea. In general, I would have a preference 
>for combining Review Team meetings with other 
>meetings most or all of us attend if possible – 
>for me that would be ICANN and the IGF this autumn/winter.
>
>I would support Alan's proposal on the briefing 
>which would no doubt be helpful as a baseline. I 
>would also be interested in seeing the work plan 
>of the previous review team or of a similar 
>exercise, so as to have an idea of next steps, 
>useful frequency of meetings, realistic 
>deadlines for deliverables with a team this size 
>etc. – this might also help us with the scope 
>discussion. On scope, you may already be aware 
>that the GAC has largely endorsed the GNSO 
>proposal, with the exception of the last point on overlaps with the RDS PDP.
>
>Looking forward to meeting you all in Johannesburg.
>
>Best regards
>Cathrin
>
>From: rds-whois2-rt-bounces at icann.org 
>[mailto:rds-whois2-rt-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
>Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 4:24 PM
>To: Alice Jansen; RDS WHOIS2-RT List
>Subject: Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] GUIDANCE NEEDED - Planning
>
>Hi Alice,
>
>I think a September meeting would be fine. 
>Exactly how much work we will do before that is 
>less clear, for the same reason holding an 
>earlier meeting would be problematic. Certainly, 
>we can start talking about scope, and 
>leadership. And as I said in my previous 
>message, I think the decisions should be in that order.
>
>I would definitely plan at least a 1-day and 
>perhaps 2-day meeting prior to ICANN60. And I 
>would schedule a consultation session or 
>sessions. I think we will need to discuss 
>whether we do a single session with the entire 
>community, or meetings with each AC/SO, or both.
>
>I again suggest that prior to our doing almost 
>anything, I would like to have a written 
>briefing from staff on the recommendations of 
>the first WHIS-RT, their implementation 
>methodology and current status, and any other 
>comments that staff has. I am attaching a 
>comparable document given to ATRT2. I am NOT 
>suggesting that the new document be patterned 
>after this one, as it had a number of critical 
>flaws, but am including it solely to demonstrate 
>that such a thing is possible. This one was 
>created at the request of ATRT2 to fill a gap in 
>its understanding of the WHOIS RT 
>Recommendations. I also note that ATRT2 made a 
>very specific recommendation that such reports 
>be prepared for future review teams and this 
>recommendation was accepted by the Board. Specifically:
>
>11.4. Complete implementation reports
>The Board should prepare a complete 
>implementation report to be ready by review 
>kick-off. This report should be submitted for 
>public consultation, and relevant benchmarks and 
>metrics must be incorporated in the report.
>
>Regards, Alan
>
>At 22/06/2017 06:12 AM, Alice Jansen wrote:
>
>
>Dear Review Team Members,
>
>Your first Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>In light of your decision to not hold your first 
>face-to-face meeting during ICANN 59 and to meet 
>informally instead, we wish to seek your 
>guidance on when you envision holding your first 
>in-person session so we may plan accordingly.
>
>As many tend to take time off in July-August, we 
>would suggest holding your first face-to-face 
>session in early September 2017 and scheduling 
>calls throughout July-August to advance work, as appropriate.
>
>Please advise whether the September timeframe is 
>acceptable and if you have any dates to suggest 
>for the meeting and/or conflicts we should be 
>mindful of. This is a suggestion for your 
>consideration – should you wish to schedule a 
>meeting earlier, or have other suggestions, please share using this list.
>
>In addition, we would also welcome any 
>suggestions you may have on meeting location 
>(subject to budget, availability etc.) so we may 
>relay them to the meetings team to inform their 
>venue search. For instance, we have a meeting 
>room in Brussels, at the ICANN office, which 
>could potentially be used for this meeting.
>
>ICANN 60
>
>For planning purposes –“ kindly note that as 
>indicated in the slides presented on your call 
>#1, we have been given the following deadlines 
>to request a one-day session at ICANN 60 (Abu Dhabi – 28 Oct-3 Nov 2017):
>
>·         30 June – deadline for any sessiions 
>to be held prior to the ICANN 60 program;
>·         30 July - deadline for any sessions to 
>be held during the ICANN 60 program
>
>We would be grateful if the Review Team could 
>let us know by the 30 June due date if you wish 
>to hold a meeting prior to ICANN 60 and if there 
>is interest in holding a public consultation during ICANN 60.
>
>We look forward to reading your input.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Best regards
>
>Alice
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
> 
>1;DM5PR03MB2714;27:FDqlXOg++4Y0Fz5YMVuBWh5+YvyTsymIMYOZPIImiokqH41ogt4kQWt+Mmlq4Z2k5/sjF5fTqOk2I3VLSHy5EuZtj7Ty+gseqk1b0+DKMp302brm5TQQL8j6IwwjKTT9IgqeJXihpDaeTO2GEgKCCw==
>X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
> 
>ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(400001000128)(400125000095)(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028)(400001001212)(400125100095)(61617095)(400001002128)(400125200095);
>
>_______________________________________________
>RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
><mailto:RDS-WHOIS2-RT at icann.org>RDS-WHOIS2-RT at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/attachments/20170622/6810cc20/attachment.html>