[rssac-caucus] FOR REVIEW: Elements of Potential Root Operators

[abby pan]

Hello,

In  3.4.2 Network Provider Diversity




*Utilizing multiple upstream network providers can be of benefit to
candidate operators that use third-party network providers. Candidate
operators SHOULD demonstrate or document that they are not susceptible to
the problems and sustained outages of a single network provider. *

I think we can add one more sentence like :

Candidate operators SHOULD assure a comfortable round trip time (RTT) on
local cross-network-provider query traffic.

Andrew Mcconachie <andrew.mcconachie at icann.org>于2016年9月7日周三 上午4:42写道：

> Dear RSSAC Caucus,
>
> On behalf of the work party for RSSAC Workshop 2 Statement 4, attached
> please find *Key Technical Elements of Potential Root Operators*.
>
> This work party first met on June 23, 2016 and roughly every other week
> thereafter. For more information on the creation of this work party, please
> see the section on *Evolution* from the *Report from the 2nd RSSAC
> Workshop*.
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rssac-workshop-26jun16-en.pdf
>
> The work party invites you to review this document and provide your
> feedback by close of business *4 October 2016*.
>
> Feedback should be sent to the RSSAC Caucus list directly.
>
> There will also be two teleconferences held to discuss this document and
> capture feedback. Doodle polls for exact times forthcoming.
> *September 15th*
> *September 22nd*
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> rssac-caucus mailing list
> rssac-caucus at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
>
-- 

Best Regards

Pan Lanlan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssac-caucus/attachments/20160912/6debbb4a/attachment.html>