[rssac-caucus] [Ext] FOR REVIEW: Harmonizing the Anonymization of Queries to the Root

[Paul Hoffman]

On Feb 28, 2018, at 10:33 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Wessels, Duane <dwessels at verisign.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 21, 2018, at 2:53 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at icann.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Feb 13, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Wessels, Duane via rssac-caucus <rssac-caucus at icann.org> wrote:
>>>> In addition I would really like to see some kind of summary (table perhaps) that presents the following for the various techniques:
>>>> 
>>>> - advantages / disadvantages
>>> 
>>> I don't think that is possible to do in a clean fashion. The advantages/disadvantages change radically if you are a:
>>> - RSO
>>> - Researcher
>>> - Person who wants your IP address completely anonymized
>> 
>> Really?  The document already talks about advantages and disadvantages (sec 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, appendix C) and AFAICT presents them without any commentary on "who" you are.  I was proposing a summary table.
> 
> Ah, got it. That will be challenging, but I'll make a stab at it.

On re-reading the document, I realized that what I really needed to do was to clarify which party was getting which advantage and disadvantage. I have now done that in an update you will see soon.

I started making a grand table of advantages and disadvantages, and they really don't make sense out of context. I think someone really needs to read 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and Appendix C in full to understand what the choices mean.

--Paul Hoffman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssac-caucus/attachments/20180306/50946730/signature.asc>