[RZERC] Possible scenarios to take up or turn down

[Howard Eland]

Dear colleagues,

As we discussed on the call today, here’s a (short) start of a list of examples we might want to review as part of our charter, as well as those we might not want to consider.  Please add/change/delete/throw tomatoes as appropriate.  Apologies if I’ve jumped the gun here.

Possible list of topics the RZERC committee should review:

- Introduction of RRTYPEs not previously included in the root zone (this would cover DNSSEC in the past).
- Changes which would cause a “significant” change in size to the root zone (Significant TBD).
- Significant changes to the operation of the root zone, such as
	- Change in root zone operator
	- Change in DNSSEC key algorithm or size
	- KSK roll?
- Changes in operational policy
	- Significant change in root DPS (Significant TBD)


Possible list of topics the RZERC committee should decline to review:

- Daily “standard” changes to the root zone (Standard TBD).
- Introduction of new TLDs into the root zone (subject to the size bullet above).

-Howard