[social-media-wg] Flickr Pictures in ICANN Group pool

[Peter Knight]

Yes, the CC 4.0 International license is state of the art.

Used it for the *Broadband in Brazil*, English translation of *Banda Larga
no Brasil*, supported by Google, that you can download free subject to this
license (see signature file).

Cheers,

Peter



----
Peter T. Knight, Ph.D.
Economista e Estrategista de Transformação Digital
Socio fundador, pesquisador e membro do Conselho Diretor, Instituto Fernand
 Braudel de Economia Mundial www.braudel.org.br

Skype: <minhoco2005>
Facebook: http://facebook.com/dartmouth.62
http://facebook.com/bandalarganobrasil/
Twitter: @ptknight_    @BandaLargaBR
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/in/petertknight
Author: A Internet no Brasil
<https://www.amazon.com.br/Internet-Brasil-Estrat%C3%A9gia-Desenvolvimento-Governan%C3%A7a-ebook/dp/B00KRO3XNU/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1465681144&sr=1-1&keywords=A+Internet+no+Brasil%2C+Peter+Knight>
 and The Internet in Brazil
<https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=The+Internet+in+Brazil%2C+Peter+T.+Knight>
; Banda Larga no Brasil
<https://www.amazon.com.br/Banda-Larga-Brasil-Passado-Presente-ebook/dp/B01GEP35CO/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1465637712&sr=1-1&keywords=banda+larga+no+brasil>
 and Broadband in Brazil
<https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s9kuh1cbpzfsde6/AABav_mQ8_1G9NuwNWHNpxuwa?dl=0>


On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Glenn,
>
> I see by clicking the license brings up this text about licenses :
> https://help.yahoo.com/kb/flickr/SLN25525.html?impressions=true
>
> I'm thinking the appropriate licensing that should be used by the photos
> are
> Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Sharealike
> Yahoo links to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ but I
> see there is a newer version of this license on Creative Commons's site
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
>
> Is this the appropriate license?
>
> Dev Anand
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> As followup to today's call.  I have mentioned on numerous occasions
>>  that  the licence that  ICANN  uses for photos of ATLARGE  isn't
>> appropriate
>>
>> Example of one group
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/at-large/albums/72157619193393
>> 532/with/3559450051/
>>
>> The licence that was selected is ALL RIGHTS  Reserved
>>
>> Description
>> License TypeInfo about the license
>> All Rights Reserved You, the copyright holder, reserve all rights
>> provided by copyright law, such as the right to make copies, distribute
>> your work, perform your work, license, or otherwise exploit your work; no
>> rights are waived under this license.
>>
>>
>>
>> My opinion and it seemed to be shared by the  meeting today is that this
>> is not the appropriate licence  for a community such as  ATLARGE and
>> clearly not functional for a Social Media engagement
>>
>> The request is find out why COMM  has made this decision rather than a
>> Creative Commons Share Alike licence.   You have options in FLICKR.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Glenn McKnight
>> mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
>> skype  gmcknight
>> twitter gmcknight
>> .
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Social-media-WG mailing list
>> Social-media-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media-wg
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media-WG mailing list
> Social-media-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media-wg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/social-media-wg/attachments/20170224/8abc7915/attachment-0001.html>