[social-media-wg] Flickr Pictures in ICANN Group pool

[Seun Ojedeji]

Thanks for bringing this up Glenn, I actually didn't pay attention to this
in the past and may have shared/modified images from atlarge/ICANN
(including the ones where I featured [1])

I agree with getting a formal response on this from comms; I do think all
ICANN publicly accessible images should imitate FLOSS principles

Regards
1. Interesting that even the one I featured in would be affected as well.
;-)

On Feb 24, 2017 5:43 PM, "Glenn McKnight" <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
> As followup to today's call.  I have mentioned on numerous occasions  that
>  the licence that  ICANN  uses for photos of ATLARGE  isn't appropriate
>
> Example of one group
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/at-large/albums/72157619193393532/with/
> 3559450051/
>
> The licence that was selected is ALL RIGHTS  Reserved
>
> Description
> License TypeInfo about the license
> All Rights Reserved You, the copyright holder, reserve all rights
> provided by copyright law, such as the right to make copies, distribute
> your work, perform your work, license, or otherwise exploit your work; no
> rights are waived under this license.
>
>
>
> My opinion and it seemed to be shared by the  meeting today is that this
> is not the appropriate licence  for a community such as  ATLARGE and
> clearly not functional for a Social Media engagement
>
> The request is find out why COMM  has made this decision rather than a
> Creative Commons Share Alike licence.   You have options in FLICKR.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Glenn McKnight
> mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
> skype  gmcknight
> twitter gmcknight
> .
>
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media-WG mailing list
> Social-media-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media-wg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/social-media-wg/attachments/20170225/4a53694c/attachment.html>