[social-media-wg] Flickr Pictures in ICANN Group pool

[Glenn McKnight]

Hi Seun

I  had a conversation with  Dev after the meeting and I clarified that  the
ICANN ATLARGE  Pool or  group should be Creative Commons  and not the
 ICANN site-  respecting their  photographers  rights.    My request was an
explanation by staff why they elected to have the  All Rights  Reserved.
It speaks volumes  that they try to rationalize their position.

Secondly,  I can prove with over 2.5 million views that  my approach has
more results. My pictures focuses on our community  vs many of their
pictures  are of a group and devoid of any individuals .  No respect for
the  individual .

G




Glenn McKnight
mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
skype  gmcknight
twitter gmcknight
.

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for bringing this up Glenn, I actually didn't pay attention to this
> in the past and may have shared/modified images from atlarge/ICANN
> (including the ones where I featured [1])
>
> I agree with getting a formal response on this from comms; I do think all
> ICANN publicly accessible images should imitate FLOSS principles
>
> Regards
> 1. Interesting that even the one I featured in would be affected as well.
> ;-)
>
> On Feb 24, 2017 5:43 PM, "Glenn McKnight" <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> As followup to today's call.  I have mentioned on numerous occasions
>>  that  the licence that  ICANN  uses for photos of ATLARGE  isn't
>> appropriate
>>
>> Example of one group
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/at-large/albums/72157619193393
>> 532/with/3559450051/
>>
>> The licence that was selected is ALL RIGHTS  Reserved
>>
>> Description
>> License TypeInfo about the license
>> All Rights Reserved You, the copyright holder, reserve all rights
>> provided by copyright law, such as the right to make copies, distribute
>> your work, perform your work, license, or otherwise exploit your work; no
>> rights are waived under this license.
>>
>>
>>
>> My opinion and it seemed to be shared by the  meeting today is that this
>> is not the appropriate licence  for a community such as  ATLARGE and
>> clearly not functional for a Social Media engagement
>>
>> The request is find out why COMM  has made this decision rather than a
>> Creative Commons Share Alike licence.   You have options in FLICKR.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Glenn McKnight
>> mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
>> skype  gmcknight
>> twitter gmcknight
>> .
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Social-media-WG mailing list
>> Social-media-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media-wg
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/social-media-wg/attachments/20170225/d35b4698/attachment.html>