[Ssr2-review] ACTION: Review work plan

[k claffy]

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 09:28:40PM +0300, Matogoro Jabera wrote:
 > Dear Jennifer and Colleagues,
 > 
 > Please check the percentages on the Research and Studies, it should read
 > 78%
 > While English is not my first language but I am not comfortable with the
 > wording  "Inward Facing" and "Outward Facing ". Please let us using wording
 > that refer what has been instructed in our ToR and the Bylaws.


I 100% agree with Matogoro-san here,
I object to "Inward Facing" and "Outward Facing",
i think they are inaccurate descriptions of what's in the
workstreams, and they are confusing and confounding terminology.
Can someone summarize why this change was made?

 > On the Research and Studies, we are missing "activities done by the review
 > team on this matter" If we remain silent then we will be missing scientific
 > proof to justify most of our recommendations. This was very critical to
 > identify some gaps in most of the activities carried out by this review.


Matogoro-san,
I am confused by your use of 'missing scientific proof' here.
We are not doing science here.  Can you give a concrete example
of what you mean?

I'm not sure what your last sentence is referring to.
What was critical to identifying what gaps in what activities?

WRT percentages on the spreadsheet, as I said two calls ago,
I'm not in a position to evaluate the "completed" percentages
in this spreadsheet, and I believe this is a management function,
and we should let our elected management be responsible for it.

(Very worried we're spending so much time on meta-work
when there is so much work to do and so little time.)
k