symlinks
Olson, Arthur David
OLSONA at dc37a.nci.nih.gov
Tue Feb 3 14:21:54 UTC 1998
We do indeed need an addition to #define HAVE_SYMLINK in private.h; I've
added it.
The peculiar
#if (HAVE_SYMLINK - 0)
compiles when HAVE_SYMLINK is undefined; it's the form used in many places
in the code.
Since the behavior of zic is being changed, a warning seems mandatory.
Since there's been one reported challenge worldwide with the lack of
symlinks over the last
decade, I don't sense an urgent need to be able to disable the warning.
--ado
*** 7.46/private.h Tue Feb 3 09:20:01 1998
--- 7.47/private.h Tue Feb 3 09:20:01 1998
***************
*** 21,27 ****
#ifndef lint
#ifndef NOID
! static char privatehid[] = "@(#)private.h 7.46";
#endif /* !defined NOID */
#endif /* !defined lint */
--- 21,27 ----
#ifndef lint
#ifndef NOID
! static char privatehid[] = "@(#)private.h 7.47";
#endif /* !defined NOID */
#endif /* !defined lint */
***************
*** 46,51 ****
--- 46,55 ----
#define HAVE_STRERROR 0
#endif /* !defined HAVE_STRERROR */
+ #ifndef HAVE_SYMLINK
+ #define HAVE_SYMLINK 1
+ #endif /* !defined HAVE_SYMLINK */
+
#ifndef HAVE_UNISTD_H
#define HAVE_UNISTD_H 1
#endif /* !defined HAVE_UNISTD_H */
More information about the tz
mailing list