sm at resistor.net
Wed Mar 6 09:28:45 UTC 2013
At 13:07 05-03-2013, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote:
>I don't agree. Such material would be "informational" exactly as it
>is today, not "normative" -- it gives background, it doesn't create
>any new requirements. The only consequence of having it in an RFC
>is that it would be visible rather than buried. And based on the
>discussion we've been having, that is clearly a needed improvement.
There is an indirect link  between my comment and things that
happened. It's useful to keep the project going .
More information about the tz