[tz] Discussion in ECMA about tz identifiers in JavaScript

[SM]

Hi Paul,
At 13:07 05-03-2013, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote:
>I don't agree.  Such material would be "informational" exactly as it 
>is today, not "normative" -- it gives background, it doesn't create 
>any new requirements.  The only consequence of having it in an RFC 
>is that it would be visible rather than buried.  And based on the 
>discussion we've been having, that is clearly a needed improvement.

There is an indirect link [1] between my comment and things that 
happened.  It's useful to keep the project going [2].

Regards,
-sm

1. http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2009-August/015750.html
2. http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2011-October/016898.html