[UA-discuss] UASG Response to WordFence IDN Phishing concerns

[Maxim Alzoba]

Dear Vittorio, 

if you read public comments to LGRs ICANN invented, 
you will see that those rules are not so wise.

(Unfortunately they try to create rules where nobody needed it sometimes, and also not always use business practices - for example for Japanese LGRs
https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-japanese-lgr-second-level-27jan17/ <https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-japanese-lgr-second-level-27jan17/>
) 

Sincerely Yours,

Maxim Alzoba
Special projects manager,
International Relations Department,
FAITID

m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp)
skype oldfrogger

Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow)

> On Apr 26, 2017, at 15:37, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com> wrote:
> 
>> Il 26 aprile 2017 alle 11.50 Dusan Stojicevic <dusan at dukes.in.rs> ha scritto:
>> 
>> If you want to change agreement with cc’s, in order to address their rules for registration, is not going to be easy task for ICANN, because of the nature of agreements. Some of them are just in the form of „exchange of letters“ and zou know which level of agreement is that.  
>> 
> I really think that we are spending lots of energies on a non-problem here. If ICANN develops some good best practices/rules and pushes them to the gTLD registries, over which it has full regulatory powers, then these practices will naturally become the reference for everyone and I am sure that most ccTLDs which are affected by the problem will just voluntarily adopt them as well.
> 
> Also, most if not all of the potential phishing attempts will be focused on .com domains, because that is where most global businesses and paid services are, so fixing the .com namespace is the first and foremost issue and would already prevent the majority of the risks.
> 
> Other big ccTLDs will just follow, and anyway often they disallow the Cyrillic script altogether, as Cyrillic is not used in their country; and the ccTLDs for countries where Cyrillic is a national script have already been dealing with this issue for a long time anyway, so they're possibly well prepared already.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> 
> Vittorio Bertola
> Research & Innovation Engineer 
> 
> 
> Cell:	+39 348 7015022
> Skype:	in-skype-ox at bertola.eu
> Email:	vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com <mailto:vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com>
>  
> Twitter: @openexchange <http://twitter.com/openexchange> - Facebook: OpenXchange <https://www.facebook.com/OpenXchange> - Web: www.open-xchange.com <http://www.open-xchange.com/>
> 	Open-Xchange AG, Rollnerstr. 14, 90408 Nuremberg, District Court Nuremberg HRB 24738
> Managing Board: Rafael Laguna de la Vera, Carsten Dirks, Uwe Reumuth 
> Chairman of the Board: Richard Seibt
> 
> European Office: 
> Open-Xchange GmbH, Olper Huette 5f, D-57462 Olpe, Germany, District Court Siegen, HRB 8718 
> Managing Directors: Frank Hoberg, Martin Kauss
> 
> US Office: 
> Open-Xchange. Inc., 530 Lytton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301, USA 
>  
> Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from your system.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20170426/1ecc9f6f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6064 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20170426/1ecc9f6f/image1.png>