[UA-discuss] UA and phishiness

Asmus Freytag asmusf at ix.netcom.com
Thu Apr 26 18:44:18 UTC 2018


On 4/26/2018 11:08 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Well, to be clear, the point of the discussion I'm in is around 
> automatic blacklisting of everything in a "shady" TLD.
>
Draconian, but effectively the only incentive for a shady TLD to clean 
up its act.

A./

> -- 
> Please excuse my clumbsy thums
> ----------
> On April 26, 2018 11:36:44 Richard Merdinger <rmerdinger at godaddy.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>> I get the connection, but I think that this is adjacent to our remit 
>> as opposed to part of it.
>>
>> Other thoughts on this?
>>
>> Richard Merdinger
>> VP, Domains
>> rmerdinger at godaddy.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> Sent: April 26, 2018 12:34 PM
>> To: ua-discuss at icann.org
>> Subject: [UA-discuss] UA and phishiness
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm in a meeting about the web PKI and there's a discussion about how 
>> poor
>> the anti-abuse stance is of some new TLDs. Does UASG have a view about
>> this?  Should it?
>>
>> A
>>
>> -- 
>> Please excuse my clumbsy thums
>
>
>
>



More information about the UA-discuss mailing list