[UA-discuss] UA and phishiness
Asmus Freytag
asmusf at ix.netcom.com
Thu Apr 26 18:44:18 UTC 2018
On 4/26/2018 11:08 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Well, to be clear, the point of the discussion I'm in is around
> automatic blacklisting of everything in a "shady" TLD.
>
Draconian, but effectively the only incentive for a shady TLD to clean
up its act.
A./
> --
> Please excuse my clumbsy thums
> ----------
> On April 26, 2018 11:36:44 Richard Merdinger <rmerdinger at godaddy.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>> I get the connection, but I think that this is adjacent to our remit
>> as opposed to part of it.
>>
>> Other thoughts on this?
>>
>> Richard Merdinger
>> VP, Domains
>> rmerdinger at godaddy.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> Sent: April 26, 2018 12:34 PM
>> To: ua-discuss at icann.org
>> Subject: [UA-discuss] UA and phishiness
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm in a meeting about the web PKI and there's a discussion about how
>> poor
>> the anti-abuse stance is of some new TLDs. Does UASG have a view about
>> this? Should it?
>>
>> A
>>
>> --
>> Please excuse my clumbsy thums
>
>
>
>
More information about the UA-discuss
mailing list