[UA-discuss] Boilerplate answers for contracted parties
Mark Datysgeld
mark at governanceprimer.com
Thu Nov 18 07:36:31 UTC 2021
Everyone,
On today's GNSO Council meeting, Kurt Pritz raised an interesting
question: we do not provide a set of standard answers for registries and
registrars to respond to their clients when a domain that needs UA fails
to be have their email accepted or a website address fails to be recognized.
Thinking about it, we could actually use that as an outreach mechanism.
Something along the lines of "We are involved in a global effort to
promote the acceptance of all domain names, and ideally you should get
in touch with the website that rejected your email and make them aware
that there is demand for them to support this technology. You can
forward them this link [uasg.tech]" (only a loose idea here).
Something to consider.
Best,
--
Mark W. Datysgeld [markwd.website <https://markwd.website>]
Director at Governance Primer [governanceprimer.com
<https://governanceprimer.com>]
ICANN GNSO Councilor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/ua-discuss/attachments/20211118/8bd3e71b/attachment.html>
More information about the UA-discuss
mailing list