[UA-discuss] Boilerplate answers for contracted parties

[Don Hollander]

They could ask the issue be logged with the UASG HELPdesk 

> On 18/11/2021, at 8:37 PM, Mark Datysgeld via UA-discuss <ua-discuss at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Everyone,
> 
> On today's GNSO Council meeting, Kurt Pritz raised an interesting question: we do not provide a set of standard answers for registries and registrars to respond to their clients when a domain that needs UA fails to be have their email accepted or a website address fails to be recognized.
> 
> Thinking about it, we could actually use that as an outreach mechanism. Something along the lines of "We are involved in a global effort to promote the acceptance of all domain names, and ideally you should get in touch with the website that rejected your email and make them aware that there is demand for them to support this technology. You can forward them this link [uasg.tech]" (only a loose idea here).
> 
> Something to consider.
> 
> Best,
> 
> -- 
> Mark W. Datysgeld [markwd.website]
> Director at Governance Primer [governanceprimer.com]
> ICANN GNSO Councilor
> _______________________________________________
> UA-discuss mailing list
> UA-discuss at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/ua-discuss/attachments/20211118/e8f812e2/attachment.html>