[vip] FW: ICANN News Alert -- IDN Variant Issues Project: Draft Integrated Issues Report

[JFC Morfin]

Dear Francisco,
as I answered Naela, I apologize for the confusion. I did not notice 
the confirmation mail. I sent it back when I saw her mail. My 
yesterday mail is now listed. Thank you to everyone.
Harald's request of the word version would really help to build an 
internal working document.
Best.
jfc


At 21:04 06/01/2012, Francisco Arias wrote:
>I just did a test posting from a gmail account and it went through (and
>later deleted it). Did you confirm the posting of your comment?, you
>should have received an email from "confirmsystem at icann dot org
><mailto:confirmsystem at icann.org>" with a subject like "ConfirmSystem:
>idn-vip-integrated-issues at icann.org [[1bfa71726df3d152]]".
>
>Once you confirm your posting it should take no more than an hour to
>appear in the public forum:
>
>http://forum.icann.org/lists/idn-vip-integrated-issues/
>
>We update the webpage every hour at 50 minutes past the hour, if it is of
>interest.
>
>Regards,
>
>__
>
>Francisco.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 1/6/12 6:05 AM, "JFC Morfin" <jefsey at jefsey.com> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >At 11:51 06/01/2012, Dennis Jennings wrote:
> >
> >Patrick,
> >
> >I understand your frustration.
> >
> >May I suggest that you send your comments on the version of the document
> >that you studied to the public comment forum, with an introductory note
> >saying that your comments are based on an earlier version of the draft
> >and that regrettably you do not have time to review the final draft
> >document.
> >
> >That would be very helpful.
> >
> >Many thanks
> >Dennis
> >
> >
> >Dennis,
> >
> >I am not sure this would be helpfull at all. I sent yesterday a comment
> >on behalf of the IUCG (iucg at ietf.org). It is still not published.
> >
> >
> >1. this document can be fond at:
> >
> >http://iucg.org/wiki/VIP_IUCG_debate
> ><http://iucg.org/wiki/VIP_IUCG_debate>
> >2. It says that we are presently doing some secretariat work to make your
> >current version a workable document (Harald's request would help)
> >3. and analysis work to make it a debatable document since it has not yet
> >any executive summary.
> >
> >If this situation persist, IUCG will try to keep publishing documents and
> >remarks on the VIP issue. I published
> >
> >http://iucg.org/wiki/VIP_D%C3%A9bate:_Patrik_Falstr%C3%B6m_inputs
> ><http://iucg.org/wiki/VIP_D%C3%A9bate:_Patrik_Falstr%C3%B6m_inputs> the
> >inputs of Patrik Falström.
> >
> >FYI. The page is
> >http://idna2010.org <http://idna2010.org/>.
> >In our IUse terminology, IDNA2010 covers the post-IDNA2008 non-IETF
> >issues, and IDNA2012 resulting common issues.
> >
> >Best
> >
> >jfc