[IAG-WHOIS conflicts] EWG recommends a replacement for whois - ?

[Michele Neylon - Blacknight]

Christopher

Short answer: because the EWG recommendations have neither been accepted nor is there any timeline for their implementation in whole or in part.

Regards

Michele

PS: I was on the EWG

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
http://www.blacknight.host/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage
http://www.technology.ie
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Social: http://mneylon.social
Random Stuff: http://www.michele.irish/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845









On 07/07/2015 20:13, "whois-iag-volunteers-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Christopher Wilkinson" <whois-iag-volunteers-bounces at icann.org on behalf of cw at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:

>
>> 
>> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/ewg-recommends-a-replacement-for-whois
>> 
>> Good afternoon:
>> 
>> Since I detect a certain uncertainty, if not a delay, as to what to do next, may I recall that ICANN has already gone to some lengths towards replacing Whois altogether.
>> 
>> In which case, why exactly, are we spending time on tweaking the ancient policy?
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> CW
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>Whois-iag-volunteers mailing list
>Whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-iag-volunteers