[IAG-WHOIS conflicts] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Proposed WHOIS language
Christopher Wilkinson
cw at christopherwilkinson.eu
Thu Sep 3 19:55:29 UTC 2015
PS: The .pdf 'track changes' texts referred to are to be found right at the bottom of the below thread.
CW
Begin forwarded message:
> From: CW Mail <mail at christopherwilkinson.eu>
> Subject: Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Proposed WHOIS language
> Date: 3 Sep 2015 21:52:34 GMT+02:00
> To: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org Accountability" <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Cc: "whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org" <whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>
>
> Good evening:
>
> With all my admiration for this excursion into 'track-changes' and many thanks to Greg for the .pdf formats:
>
> a) I have not understood why these texts need to be agreed upon now. Isn't this par excellence a case to be referred to "work stream 2" - ?
>
> b) WHOIS policy is being addressed in ICANN through several parallel processes, to the point that I have every expectation that they will give rise to inconsistent outcomes.
> We do not need CCWG to add to the process.
>
> c) In any event, I absolutely disagree to including anywhere the repeated references to " … a commitment that becomes part of ICANN Bylaws, regarding enforcement of the current WHOIS … "
>
> 1. Current WHOIS policy has proven to be unenforceable for more than a decade.
>
> 2. Current WHOIS policy, should it be enforced, jeopardises Registrars and Registrants in jurisdictions where the policy conflicts with applicable local law.
>
> 3. All of the above will have to be reviewed by the community as soon as ICANN proposes how to implement the recommendations for a new gTLD Directory Service.
>
> I suggest that CCWG drop the whole topic for the time being pending ICANN's proposals for new gTLD Directory Services.
>
> Regards
>
> CW
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Proposed WHOIS language
>> Date: 3 Sep 2015 21:05:18 GMT+02:00
>> To: Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez <crg at isoc-cr.org>
>> Cc: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org" <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>>
>> This seems to fall into the "no good deed goes unpunished" category. In any event, and in spite of not being asked, I have taken my time to convert the three documents to the PDF format, because I'm a nice guy.
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez <crg at isoc-cr.org> wrote:
>> My linux based, open source, FREE word processor opens/saves MS Word documents without any trouble………. So I don’t know what the issue is With Dr. Lisse´s IPad mini...
>>
>>
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> _____________________
>>
>> email: crg at isoc-cr.org
>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>> +506 8837 7173 (cel)
>> +506 4000 2000 (home)
>> +506 2290 3678 (fax)
>> _____________________
>> Apartado 1571-1000
>> San Jose, COSTA RICA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 3, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> To be Frank, it's pretty rude to expect everyone to use the same software supplier. (In fact, in some circumstances it's even anti-competitive).
>>>
>>> Why can't we use open standards, again?
>>>
>>> On 09/03/2015 07:46 PM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez wrote:
>>>> I welcome your increasing flexibility
>>>> the Apple store a a free app to read MS word documents now that should
>>>> work in you iPad mini
>>>>
>>>> Good luck
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>>>> _____________________
>>>>
>>>> email: crg at isoc-cr.org <mailto:crg at isoc-cr.org>
>>>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>>>> +506 8837 7173 (cel)
>>>> +506 4000 2000 (home)
>>>> +506 2290 3678 (fax)
>>>> _____________________
>>>> Apartado 1571-1000
>>>> San Jose, COSTA RICA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 3, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na
>>>>> <mailto:el at lisse.na>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not even going to bother to ask, for, the umpteenth time, that
>>>>> documents are posted in an open format.
>>>>>
>>>>> el
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 3, 2015, at 17:24, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> All:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For what it's worth, I prepared track changes comparisons of the
>>>>>> following:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CCWG Proposal vs. AoC language
>>>>>> Board Proposal vs. AoC language
>>>>>> Board Proposal vs. CCWG Proposal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These are attached.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net
>>>>>> <mailto:malcolm at linx.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 03/09/2015 13:27, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>>>>>> > Hello Malcolm,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On 02/09/2015 02:24, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>>>>>> >> ICANN commits to enforcing its policy relating to the current WHOIS
>>>>>> >> and any future gTLD Directory Service,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > To be clear - we are not talking about any specific service here with any pre-conceived set of requirements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed. But I did think there was a risk that wording could be
>>>>>> (mis)interpreted to suggest that we are - and then used to that
>>>>>> effect
>>>>>> when discussing what that future Directory Service might look like.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > We are talking about a new service that is established as a result of a policy development process in the GNSO. If it helps you could add the text:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > "any future gTLD DIrectory Service, established via ICANN's bottom up policy development process".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that would help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only point that I'm making is that we aren't trying to
>>>>>> pre-empt that
>>>>>> process or use this insertion into the Bylaws to direct certain
>>>>>> outcomes
>>>>>> from it. On that, I think we're all agreed; it's just a matter of
>>>>>> being
>>>>>> clear in the language we choose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
>>>>>> <tel:%2B44%2020%207645%203523>
>>>>>> Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
>>>>>> London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> London Internet Exchange Ltd
>>>>>> 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Company Registered in England No. 3137929
>>>>>> Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>>>> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <CCWG vs AoC Whois Review Comparison.docx>
>>>>>> <Board vs AoC Whois Review Comparison.docx>
>>>>>> <Board vs CCWG Whois Review Comparison.docx>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>>>> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>>> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/whois-iag-volunteers/attachments/20150903/e9c2b5e7/attachment-0004.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CCWG vs AoC Whois Review Comparison.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 98813 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/whois-iag-volunteers/attachments/20150903/e9c2b5e7/CCWGvsAoCWhoisReviewComparison-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/whois-iag-volunteers/attachments/20150903/e9c2b5e7/attachment-0005.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Board vs AoC Whois Review Comparison.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 97668 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/whois-iag-volunteers/attachments/20150903/e9c2b5e7/BoardvsAoCWhoisReviewComparison-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/whois-iag-volunteers/attachments/20150903/e9c2b5e7/attachment-0006.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Board vs CCWG Whois Review Comparison.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 96765 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/whois-iag-volunteers/attachments/20150903/e9c2b5e7/BoardvsCCWGWhoisReviewComparison-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/whois-iag-volunteers/attachments/20150903/e9c2b5e7/attachment-0007.html>
More information about the Whois-iag-volunteers
mailing list