[IAG-WHOIS conflicts] Draft preliminary report

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi,

For reference, the recently concluded CCWG PC had minority statements
included. I think it may be good to include it in the report due for public
comment so one could further determine level of support from the community
on the respective minority statements.

Cheers!

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 17 Sep 2015 19:14, "Jamie Hedlund" <jamie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:

> Christopher,
>
> I will do my best to identify your changes.
>
> Regarding your Appendix 3 and other requests to provide a minority
> statement, it does not seem appropriate to include these in a document on
> which public comment is sought. Rather, minority statements are
> incorporated into final reports. At that point, public comments have been
> considered and the group has identified where there is consensus. It would
> be appropriate for minority views to be submitted as public comment. If,
> after taking into account the universe of public comments, these views do
> not generate consensus support, they would be ripe for attachment to the
> final report as minority statements.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns with this
> approach. Thank you.
>
> Best,
> Jamie
>
> Jamie Hedlund
> VP, Strategic Programs
> Global Domains Division
> ICANN
> +1.202.374.3969 (m)
> +1.202.570.7125 (d)
> jamie.hedlund at icann.org
>
> From: Christopher Wilkinson <cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>
> Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 14:00
> To: Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org>
> Cc: "whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org" <whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [IAG-WHOIS conflicts] Draft preliminary report
>
> No, Jamie, there are a number of amendments and additions in the body of
> the text.
>
> Since your version is in .docx and my edits are in .odt, track changes
> does not seem to work.
> (I do not know how to do 'red-lining')
>
> I suggest that if you do a 'compare documents' you will get the changes.
>
> Otherwise: Search for 'N.B.'  and for 'applicable'' and you will get most
> of them.
>
> Regards
>
> CW
>
>
>
>
> On 17 Sep 2015, at 19:50, Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:
>
> Christopher,
>
> Thank you. Could you please confirm that the only change you made to the
> base text was the addition of Appendix 3? Since the document is not
> redlined I wanted to make sure we captured your proposed edits. Thanks
> again.
>
> Best,
> Jamie
>
> Jamie Hedlund
> VP, Strategic Programs
> Global Domains Division
> ICANN
> +1.202.374.3969 (m)
> +1.202.570.7125 (d)
> jamie.hedlund at icann.org
>
> From: Christopher Wilkinson <cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>
> Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 13:24
> To: Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org>
> Cc: "whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org" <whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [IAG-WHOIS conflicts] Draft preliminary report
>
> Good evening:
>
> Please find attached my edits to the draft preliminary report.
>
> With many thanks for your attention
>
> Regards
>
> Christopher Wilkinson
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Whois-iag-volunteers mailing list
> Whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-iag-volunteers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/whois-iag-volunteers/attachments/20150917/b219e20e/attachment.html>