[Party1] template - consensus defined for ICANN dealing with GAC advice - draft1

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Jordan
Thank you very much for the draft.
I understand from the draft that therte would be only "CONSENSUS ADVICE"
from GAC to ICANN Board
However, today, GAC could advise the ICANN Board with advice on which no
consensus is reached and that is an aimportant elements on which the system
is working.
There are several examples of such kind of advice.
Please kindly identify where such advice is referred to .
In the darft the term" should " have been used which has optional
connotation.
May you kindly consider some more strongert terms
Regards
Kavouss


2015-03-01 3:41 GMT+01:00 Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz>:

> Hi all
>
> Attached is the second template I was drafting, trying to explain how the
> ICANN bylaws could define the level of consensus at which ICANN must take
> "due consideration" of GAC advice.
>
> Please note that there will be *sensitivities* with this especially with
> the interaction with GAC decision making. I have tried to be very clear
> that this has *no impact* on GAC's decision making. I apologise in
> advance if in drafting this I have accidentally caused any offence or
> difficulties for any part of the ICANN community.
>
> *ICANN Staff - *could you post these on the Wiki and create a google doc
> for future editing as well?
>
> I look forward to your comments and thoughts and improvements!
>
> best,
> Jordan
>
> --
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> Skype: jordancarter
>
> *A better world through a better Internet *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150301/9eee8853/attachment.html>