[Party1] template - removal of ICANN directors - draft 1

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Mar 3 16:30:39 UTC 2015


Mathieu
In my view yes.
Those nominated by NonCom are less legitimate with respect to those elected/ designated by their respective community
Kavouss  

Sent from my iPhone

> On 1 Mar 2015, at 23:33, Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jordan
> 
> Just wondering w/r/t this: the decision would have to arise out of democratic decisions of various SOs/ACs 
> 
> What about those Directors who are selected by the NomCom (not selected by any particular community)?   Would it make any difference?
> 
> Matthew
> 
>> On 2/28/2015 8:43 AM, Jordan Carter wrote:
>> Dear WP1 members
>> 
>> I've had a go at item 7a in our work listing, the mechanism of removing ICANN directors.  Attached is my first draft of that paper for your review and comment.
>> 
>> I've kept it pretty simple, with the power basically being given to whatever mechanism we design to represent "the community". 
>> 
>> ICANN staff, could you turn this into a Google doc, and post on the Wiki?
>> 
>> Thanks all, look forward to your thoughts.
>> 
>> cheers
>> Jordan
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jordan Carter
>> 
>> Chief Executive 
>> InternetNZ
>> 
>> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
>> jordan at internetnz.net.nz 
>> Skype: jordancarter
>> 
>> A better world through a better Internet 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> WP1 mailing list
>> WP1 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150303/7f6d7b25/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the WP1 mailing list