[Party1] template - removal of ICANN directors - draft 1
Kavouss Arasteh
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Mar 3 16:30:39 UTC 2015
Mathieu
In my view yes.
Those nominated by NonCom are less legitimate with respect to those elected/ designated by their respective community
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Mar 2015, at 23:33, Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jordan
>
> Just wondering w/r/t this: the decision would have to arise out of democratic decisions of various SOs/ACs
>
> What about those Directors who are selected by the NomCom (not selected by any particular community)? Would it make any difference?
>
> Matthew
>
>> On 2/28/2015 8:43 AM, Jordan Carter wrote:
>> Dear WP1 members
>>
>> I've had a go at item 7a in our work listing, the mechanism of removing ICANN directors. Attached is my first draft of that paper for your review and comment.
>>
>> I've kept it pretty simple, with the power basically being given to whatever mechanism we design to represent "the community".
>>
>> ICANN staff, could you turn this into a Google doc, and post on the Wiki?
>>
>> Thanks all, look forward to your thoughts.
>>
>> cheers
>> Jordan
>>
>> --
>> Jordan Carter
>>
>> Chief Executive
>> InternetNZ
>>
>> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
>> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>> Skype: jordancarter
>>
>> A better world through a better Internet
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WP1 mailing list
>> WP1 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150303/7f6d7b25/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the WP1
mailing list